透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.132.194
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

國中專任輔導教師制度之角色職責定位探究:困境與因應策略

The role positioning status and the role positioning dilemma of full-time counseling teachers in junior high schools

摘要


本研究旨在探究國中專輔教師之角色職責定位概況、定位困境原由、因應策略與期待,共招募11 位國中專輔教師(平均服務年資為3.7 年),透過質性深度訪談以蒐集相關研究資料並摘錄分析。研究結果發現:專輔教師認為現今存有角色職責定位困境,其困境概況與成因為:一、學校端未事先規劃預備;二、部分工作職掌與學校端需求存有落差,致使學校自行重新調配角色職責;三、得滿足校內外單位之不適切需求與期待;四、身兼多重角色之定位兩難;五、輔導人力仍顯不足。而面對角色職責定位困境,專輔教師亦提出相關因應策略及對相關單位之期待。最後,研究根據上述結論凝聚若干實務與未來研究建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to explore the role positioning and the role positioning dilemma and strategies of the full-time counseling teachers of junior high schools in Taiwan. The study adopted in-depth interviews to collect data, and the collected data was analyzed by qualitative approach. The subjects of this study were 11 full-time counseling teachers of junior high schools, they all hold this position over 3 years. The significant findings of this study were as follows: Currently, there have role positioning dilemma among the full-time counseling teachers. The causes and status of the role positioning dilemma were: (1) Most junior high schools had no plans to assist the full-time counseling teachers to establish role positioning. (2) There had a gap between part of the accountabilities of the full-time counseling teachers and school demands, so the school administrator redeployed the accountabilities of these teachers. (3) The full-time counseling teachers must met the inappropriate demands and expectations from schools. (4) The dilemma of multiple role positioning. (5) Counseling manpower shortage. In sum, although the full-time counseling teachers faced the role positioning dilemmas, they proposed some coping strategies for these dilemmas. Finally, after discussion, the researcher proposed some suggestions for assisting the full-time counseling teachers to establish appropriate role positioning, and these suggestions also are beneficial to educational administration and future studies.

參考文獻


洪莉竹(2008)。學校輔導人員專業倫理困境與因應策略之研究。國立臺灣師大教育心理學報。39(3),451-472。
林家興、洪雅琴(2002)。專業輔導人員參與國中輔導工作的概況與成效。教育心理學報。34(1),83-102。
國民教育法(2011 年11 月30 日)。
(1999).Organizational Behavior.New Delhi:Prentice Hall of India.

被引用紀錄


楊巧玲(2022)。臺灣的國中輔導工作屬性與輔導教師專業認同:在不確定性與低能見度中自我協商教育研究與發展期刊18(3),1-32。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202209_18(3).0001

延伸閱讀