以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養

Using Contextualized Assessment to Measure the Energy Literacy of Middle and High School Students

陳冠利(Kuan-Li Chen) ； 劉湘瑤(Shiang-Yao Liu) ； 陳柏熹(Po-Hsi Chen) ； 黃書涵(Su-Han Huang)

《教育科學研究期刊》 60卷2期 (2015/06) Pp. 167-196

https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06

摘要

能源素養為知識、態度與行為組成的多面向架構，為瞭解學生能源素養的表現情形，本研究以先前發展的能源素養架構為基礎，對應各指標內涵設計六個情境式題組作為評量工具，以全國國、高中學生為施測對象，共取得2,066份有效樣本。結果顯示，學生的能源素養尚需加強，尤其是評估與判斷國際能源議題的素養指標能力，另從評量試題的文字作答分析發現，學生對溫室效應成因和生質能源等議題持有迷思概念。相關分析呈現知識與行為面向的關聯性較態度與行為的關聯性高。對節能減碳的看法和參加研習次數與素養表現有正相關；年級愈高的學生在素養的整體表現上愈好。本研究建議發展有效的能源課程及教學方式，作為能源教育推動策略之參考。

關鍵字

能源素養 ； 能源教育 ； 情境式題組

並列摘要

Energy literacy is multidimensional, comprising broad content knowledge as well as affect and behavior. In this study, an assessment was designed using six contextualized test units to examine student energy literacy. A total of 2,066 secondary students participated in the survey. The results indicated that student energy literacy is low, particularly with respect to the dimension of ＂reasoning on energy controversies＂. Qualitative analyses of student written responses to various question items revealed that students have misconceptions of biomass energy and misconstrue the sources of greenhouse gas. Inter-correlation among the dimensions of energy literacy indicated that energy knowledge and behavior are more closely correlated with each other than are affect and behavior. The students in southern Taiwan scored higher on energy literacy assessments than did the students in northern, central, as well as eastern Taiwan. These findings are a reference for developing energy-related curricula and educational materials to improve student energy literacy.

並列關鍵字

energy literacy ； energy education ； contextualized test unit

參考文獻

12.羅綸新、張正杰、童元品、楊文正（2013）。高中生海洋科學素養及迷思概念評量分析。教育科學研究期刊，58（3），51-83。 【Lwo, L.-S., Chang, C.-C., Tung, Y.-P., & Yang, W.-C. (2013). Marine science literacy and misconceptions among senior high school students. Journal of Research in Education Science, 58(3), 51-83. 】

2.宋曜廷、黃信樽、陳學志（2012）。能源與氣候變遷概念之內容分析─以自然與生活科技領域為例。教科書研究，5（2），1-30。 【Sung, Y.-T., Huang, H.-T., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Content analysis of energy and climate change concepts in elementary and middle school scientific textbooks. Journal of Textbook Research, 5(2), 1-30.】

4.林樹聲、黃柏鴻（2009）。國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究－不同學業成就學生間之比較。科學教育學刊，17（2），111-133。 【Lin, S.-S., & Huang, P.-H. (2009). Students' constructing argumentation about a socioscientific issue－The differences between sixth graders with different levels of academic achievement. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 17(2), 111-133.】

9.黃國禎、朱蕙君、王榕榆（2008）。以答題信心度為基礎之線上診斷評量系統。師大學報：教育類，53（1），1-24。 【Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., & Wang, R.-Y. (2008). Development of an on-line learning-problem diagnostic system using a confidence-scoring mechanism. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(1), 1-24.】

14.Barrow, L. H., & Morrisey, J. T. (1989). Energy literacy of ninth-grade students: A comparison between Maine and New Brunswick. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(2), 22-25.