透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.125.2
  • 期刊

運用人格、心理與環境因素預測教師教學設計想像力

Using Personality Traits and Psychological and Environmental Factors to Predict the Instructional Design Imagination of Teachers

摘要


面對當前複雜與挑戰兼具的教學情境,本研究整合運用人格特質、心理與環境因素預測國民教育階段教師,從事教學設計想像力的結構模型。本研究運用結構方程模式進行探究,模型建構奠基於教師人格特質、心理與環境影響的相關研究,整合後提出假設進行驗證並獲得支持。研究結果顯示:一、以能力導向詮釋的教學設計想像力,包含創始、構思與轉造三種想像能力;二、開放與審慎特質對教學設計想像力主要是透過直接路徑預測,外向、親和及情緒穩定特質則是透過中介作用間接預測教學設計想像力;三、內在動機與自我效能可適切扮演中介角色,帶動部分人格特質、正向情緒、做中悟,與部分環境條件預測教學設計想像力;四、環境因素順應人格特質差異,對教學設計想像力的預測型態猶有深究的空間。綜整研究結果,本研究提出實務意涵與未來研究之建議。

並列摘要


This study responded to the challenging and complex situations faced by teachers by using personality, psychological, and environmental variables to construct a predictive model of the imaginative capabilities of teachers as demonstrated in their instructional design. On the basis of previous studies of the influence of personality traits and psychological and environmental factors on imaginative capabilities, we conducted structural equation modeling to propose a predictive model and then validated it. The results revealed that: (1) the imaginative capabilities involved in instructional design included initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, and transforming imagination; (2) openness to experience and conscientiousness had strong direct effects on imaginative capabilities, whereas extraversion, emotional stability, and agreeableness indirectly predicted imaginative capabilities; (3) self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation displayed mediating roles in the personality traits and psychological and environmental factors that predicted imaginative capabilities; (4) the means by which environmental factors influence imaginative capabilities requires further exploration. Finally, this study proposed suggestions regarding the practical implications of the results and future research directions.

參考文獻


鄭博真(2011)。我國幼兒教師創造力人格特質與創造力教學行為之研究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,31,71-98。【Jeng, B.-J. (2011). A study of kindergarten teachers’ creative personality and teaching behavior for creativity in Taiwan. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal: Education and Social Sciences, 31, 71-98.】
余民寧、陳柏霖、許嘉家(2010)。教師憂鬱傾向的影響因素之研究。輔導與諮商學報,32(2),73-97。【Yu, M.-N., Chen, P.-L., & Syu, J.-J. (2010). The study of impact factors on teachers’ depression. The Archive of Guidance & Counseling, 32(2), 73-97.】
許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(2013)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究季刊,21(2),113-148。【Hsu, Y., Liang, C., & Lin, C.-C. (2013). The influences of individual psychology and school environment on the teachers' imaginative capability of instructional design. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 21(2), 113-148.】
李茂能(2010)。虛無假設顯著性考驗的演進、議題與迷思。測驗統計年刊,18(1),1-22。【Li, F. M.-N. (2010). Null hypothesis significance testing: Its evolution, current use, misuse, and misconceptions. Journal of Research on Measurement and Statistics, 18(1), 1-22.】
梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖(2014)。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊,61(1),27-49。【Liang, C., Hsu, Y., & Lin, W.-S. (2014). The study of imaginative capabilities and imaginative capability scale development. Psychological Testing, 61(1), 27-49.】

被引用紀錄


王佳琪、何曉琪(2021)。想像與現實的交織:設計領域想像-創造歷程之建構教育科學研究期刊66(4),245-280。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202112_66(4).0009
Chen, N. (2021). A Study on the Innovation Perceptions of Daily Practices of Early Childhood Teachers in Mainland China. 教育科學研究期刊, 66(1), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0009
王喜青、周儒(2020)。探索臺灣環境學習中心教師專業能力及其影響因素科學教育學刊28(1),49-73。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202003_28(1).0003
謝廷豪、廖元良、郭慧如、鄭雅云、楊雯惠、林彥霆(2023)。國小教師健康行為自我效能與幸福感關聯之研究-以五大人格特質為調節變項修平學報(46),39-66。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18172954-N202308170007-00003

延伸閱讀