國內大學學習預警資訊系統研究：發展現況與侷限

學生學習預警資訊系統被認為是評量學生學習成效、預測學習困擾、輔導高危險群學生的有力機制，尤其近年來新興資訊技術的進步，使學習預警資訊系統在規模和作法上都有所突破。國內各大學發展學習預警資訊系統已超過10年，普及率也相當高，但是相較於國外既有的深入性和檢討性研究，目前針對國內現有學習預警機制與系統運作的著述仍然頗為零散，而該系統在功能上的敏感性及資料上的隱密性，也讓各校之間缺乏相關資訊交流。因此，本研究主要透過文獻探討、訪察和訪談等方法，針對國內目前56所公私立一般大學學習預警資訊系統的現行運作情況進行概括性調查。研究發現，目前各校多已建立了學期間、即時和特殊預警等不同機制，系統使用率在許多大學也都達到半數課程以上，但在實際使用上常面臨教師反彈和後續追蹤不易等問題。建議未來各校應以加強跨單位合作、提升系統使用成效評估，以及提供更多元的預警指標為方向，進一步落實學習預警資訊系統之功能及使用效益。

關鍵字

高危險群學生；學習預警；學習預警資訊系統；學習輔導

並列摘要

The development of students' early alert systems (EAS), or students' learning alarm systems, has long been discussed by administrators and researchers in higher education. They are considered a powerful mechanism for evaluating students' learning effectiveness, predicting potential learning difficulties, and identifying academically at-risk students. The rapid growth of information technology has made the EAS advanced in scale and practice. However, although most universities in Taiwan have established similar preventive systems or mechanisms, few studies have focused on exploring actual uses of and possible restrictions on existing EAS. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to outline the current situation of EAS in Taiwanese universities. We explored the following questions: (1) What types of EAS have been established in universities in Taiwan? (2) What are the main functions and mechanisms of the current EAS? (3) What are the actual uses of EAS in universities? (4) What are the possible restrictions on and solutions for using EAS? Data were gathered from 56 public and private universities in Taiwan. Experts familiar with or in charge of EAS design, development, and use in these universities were interviewed by telephone or face-to-face. We found that although the utility rate of EAS in most universities tended to be high, faculty resistance and difficulty in follow-up assessments on EAS utilization were the two common restrictions that occurred across campuses. To enhance the use effectiveness of EAS, faculty and administrators from both departmental and institutional levels should be involved. In addition, this study suggested that in the future, universities must attempt to strengthen collaboration among units related to EAS, improve the evaluation of EAS effectiveness, and provide additional early alert indicators of students' academic performance.

並列關鍵字

at-risk student group ； academic alert ； early alert system ； intervention

參考文獻

王瑋婷、黃國倫（2016）。學生課程出席率對學習成效之影響─以國立臺北藝術大學為例。載於國立東華大學主辦之「TANET2016臺灣網際網路研討會」論文集（pp. 1129-1133），花蓮縣。【Wang, W.-T., & Huang, G.-L. (2016). The impact of student's attendance on learning outcomes: A case study at Taipei National University of the Arts. In National Dong Hwa University (Ed.), Proceeding of 2016 Taiwan Academic NETwork Conference (TANET2016) (pp. 1129-1133), Hualien, Taiwan.】

蕭玉真（2011）。提升學習成效：淺談大學教學卓越計畫，評鑑雙月刊，31，29-33。【Hsiao, Y.-C. (2011). Promoting learning effects: Program of promoting teaching excellence of universities. Evaluation Bimonthly, 31, 29-33.】

溫瑞烘（2000）。校務資訊系統研究─退學預警系統之研製。中華技術學院學報，20，22-37。【Ven, J.-H. (2000). A study of a college management information system － The design of a withdrawal-alerting system. Journal of Chia Institute of Technology, 20, 22-37.】

陳慧娟、簡洧晴（2020）。大學生選課後悔與動機干擾研究：檢驗後悔因應策略的中介效果與社會支持的調節效果。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），277-312。【Chen, H.-J., & Chien, W.-C. (2020). Effect of regret on motivational interference among college students: Regret coping strategy as a mediator and social support as a moderator. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 277-312.】

羅孟彥（2013）。支援教育品質管理之整合式資訊系統建構與研究。教育科學研究期刊，58（4），69-101。【Luo, M.-Y. (2013). Design, implementation and study of an integrated information system for educational quality management. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(4), 69-101.】

國際替代計量

國內大學學習預警資訊系統研究：發展現況與侷限

全文下載

主題瀏覽