透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.187.199
  • 期刊

學生評量教師教學問卷之修訂─一所私立科技大學的自我探究

Revision of Questionnaire for Students' Teaching Evaluation: Self-Exploration at a Private University of Technology

摘要


學生對授課教師教學表現之評量結果,除可協助教師瞭解本身教學可能的問題所在,還可做為校方決定教師之升等、續聘、獎勵或是否須接受教學專業輔導方案之參考依據。然而,評量工具之內涵若不適切,不但無法確實發揮預期功效,還可能引發教師的強烈反彈與質疑。有鑑於此,研究者試著針對本身所任職學校之學生評量教師教學問卷加以探究。過程中,研究者除邀請本校教師與學生參與研討和座談,還對他們施予問卷調查以深化探究的結果。最終,研究者指出學生評量教師教學問卷可依序包含「修課背景資料」、「教學評鑑量表」及「自由陳述與建議勾選表」等三大部份,且針對這三個部份之內涵具體提出建議。此外,研究者還闡明他所修訂之教學評鑑量表應可適用不同性質之課程,以及具良好之信度與效度。由於本文針對學生評量教師教學問卷相關問題進行較為統整之探究,探究的歷程與結果應可供其他大學校院參考。

並列摘要


Students' evaluation results of teachers' teaching performance not only can help teachers to become aware of their own teaching problems, but are also a reference for the school to decide promotions, employment renewals, rewards, and those teachers who have to participate in the teaching professional consultation programs. However, if the content of the tool for evaluation is not appropriate, the results of students' evaluation can not achieve its purpose and may trigger a strong negative reaction and doubt from the teacher. In view of this, this research attempted to explore proper contents that students' teaching evaluation questionnaire should have at a private university of technology where he taught. The researcher not only invited teachers and students to take part in discussions and seminars, but also administered a questionnaire survey to deepen the results of his study. Ultimately, the researcher pointed out that the student's teaching evaluation questionnaire can contain the following three large parts: ”information regarding studying and participation,” ”scale for teaching evaluation,” and ”area of open ended response and suggestion.” Some concrete suggestions regarding the contents of these three parts should have are also proposed by the researcher. In addition, the researcher elucidated that the scale for teaching evaluation revised by him should be applicable to different types of courses and exhibits appropriate reliability and validity. Since this research conducted a more integrated exploration on the related issues of students' teaching evaluation questionnaire, the exploration process and results can provide references for other universities and colleges.

參考文獻


楊錦章(2006)。中華大學教學評鑑之調查分析。中華行政學報。3,131-140。
潘靖英(2004)。通識教育課程學生評鑑教師教學問卷之發展─以慈濟大學為例。測驗學刊。51(1),79-102。
曹嘉秀、魏孟雪(2004)。影響學生評鑑教學之背景因素探討。測驗學刊。50(1),143-158。
蘇懿、鍾國揆(2005)。建立評量教師整體教學評鑑的分析模型。管理科學與統計決策。2(1),14-26。
張德勝(2005)。台灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究。師大學報:教育類。50(2),203-225。

被引用紀錄


林小玲、明金蓮、張靜怡、佘美桂、蕭世美、詹雅惠、施月玲(2019)。建構醫學中心護理臨床教師教學評量表之研究榮總護理36(2),112-123。https://doi.org/10.6142/VGHN.201906_36(2).0001

延伸閱讀