高中職學生社會行為評量系統之問題行為量表編製研究

A Study on the Development of Problem Behavior Scale for Adolescents

蔡明富(Ming-Fu Tsai)

《高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類》 37期 (2014/12) Pp. 1-26

摘要

本研究主要目的在編製適用於評量高中職學生問題社會行為的工具。高中職學生社會行為評量系統包含教師、家長及學生評量表，三種評量表（各110題）內容均包括兩部分：社會能力量表（48題）及問題行為量表（62題），本文主要在探討高中職學生問題行為量表之發展，並分析其信、效度。問題行為量表包括過動反抗（不專注、過動衝動及憤怒反抗）、焦慮憂鬱（焦慮害怕、身心不適及退縮悲觀）及違反規範（內隱違規、混合違規及外顯違規）等三向度九個分量表，作答方式以Likert式五點量表。結果顯示：（1）教師、家長及學生評量表之問題行為量表的內部一致性係數良好，量表間隔四週重測信度的穩定性係數尚可，量表的評量者間一致性出現低度至中度相關；（2）教師及家長評量表之問題行為量表與「阿肯巴克實證衡鑑系統」，以及學生評量表之問題行為量表與「貝克兒童及青少年量表第二版」的效標關聯效度皆達顯著水準；（3）教師評量表之問題行為量表可以有效區別情障個案與一般學生；（4）驗證性因素分析結果顯示教師、家長及學生評量表之問題行為量表均符合原先建構。最後，以高中職教師607人、家長1,168人及學生1,246人分別建立全國常模，並針對本研究量表應用與後續研究，提出相關建議。

關鍵字

社會行為 ； 問題行為量表 ； 信度 ； 效度

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was conducted to (a) develop a social behavior assessment system for adolescents-problem behavior scale; and (b) evaluate the reliability and validity of this proposed scale. The social behavior assessment system for adolescents comprised 3 scales: the teacher rating scale (TRS), parent rating scale (PRS), and self-report scale (SRS). TRS, PRS, and SRS all included 110 items in two scales: Social Competence Scale (SCS) and Problem Behavior Scale (PBS). The Problem Behavior Scale consisted of 62 items divided into 9 subscales for measuring three theoretical dimensions: hyperactivity/ oppositional, anxiety/depression, and conduct problem. The study yielded the following results: (a) TRS-PBS, PRS-PBS, and SRS-PBS all have high internal consistency reliability and 4-week-interval re-test reliability. Besides, the inter-rater reliability between teacherts, parents and students were lower to moderate; (b) content validity was established by consulting experts and exploring document; (c) the concurrent validity of the TRS-PBS and PRS-PBS were satisfactory in one criterion-referenced test (the Achenbach system of empirically based assessment) and the SRS-PBS to the Beck youth inventories was found considerably satisfactory; (d) the discriminant validity of TRS-PBS was found considerably satisfactory in discriminating emotional and behavioral problem adolescents from normal ones; (e) the results of confirmatory factory analysis were found considerably satisfactory in TRS-PBS, PRS-PBS, and SRS-PBS. In general, the reliability and validity of the study were satisfactory. Finally, the percentile rank and t-score norms were developed for 607 subjects in TRS-PBS, 1,168 subjects in PRS-PBS and 1,246 subjects in SRS-PBS. Based on the above well acceptable evidence for the reliability and validity of the instrument, its advanced application in practice and research was discussed and recommended.

並列關鍵字

Social behavior ； problem behavior scale ； reliability ； validity

參考文獻

蔡明富、吳裕益、莊涵皓(2014)。「學前兒童社會行為評量系統」編製之研究。特殊教育研究學刊。39(2)，1-31。

Achenbach, T. M.,McConaughy, S. H.,Howell, C. T.(1987).Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlation for situational specificity.Psychological Bulletin.101,213-232.

Achenbach, T. M.,Rescorla, L. A.(2001).Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles.Burlington, VT:University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.

Aiken, L. R.(1980).Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires.Educational and Psychological Measurement.40,955-959.

American Psychiatric Association(2000).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Washington, DC:Author.