Comparison of Generic Structure and Citation Practice of Dissertation Introductions Between Mechanical Engineering and Management of Technology

Hsien-Chin Liou

《English as a Global Language Education (EaGLE) Journal》 2卷2期 (2017/02) Pp. 1-31

https://doi.org/10.6294/EaGLE.2017.0202.01

摘要

This study investigated the textual organization and citation use of 24 doctoral dissertations from Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Management of Technology (MT) by students in Taiwan. Units of 'move' and 'step' were adopted to identify the textual organization prevalent in their introduction sections. Citation functions and styles were also compared. The analysis reveals similarities and differences of their textual organization as well as attribution behaviors, and highlights the unique characteristics and perspectives of each discipline. For genre structures, there were fewer differences at the move level than those at respective steps. For instance, ME writers used more texts for steps of topic generalization and literature review but MT students only showed so with much fewer citations as shown in its overall lower citation density. MT students spent more space on building topic centrality when their students used persuasive communicative resources to argue why their own projects were needed to fill existing research gaps. Concerning citation formal, Mechanical Engineering writers tended to convey a neutral attitude towards their findings by removing the agent, but students of Management of Technology adopted an author-active stance toward their work by more seemingly appended non-integral forms. Concerning why they used citations, writers of both areas mainly cited references to give credit to other scholars and support their own decisions for the research projects, Pedagogical implications are drawn from the conclusion and discussed with suggested future research.

關鍵字

generic structure ； citation ； Mechanical Engineering ； Management of Technology

參考文獻

Cheng, A. (2015a). Rethinking the paths toward developing ESP practitioners' specialized knowledge through the lens of genre analysis. English as a Global Education (EaGLE) Journal, 1(1), 23-45. doi: 10.6294/EaGLE.2015.0101.02

Liou, H. C., & Chen, W. F. (2016). Structure and citation practice of introductions among non-native expert and novice writers in Mechanical Engineering. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 8(1), 1-21. doi: 10.6706/TIESPJ.2016.8.1.1

Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004

Cheng, A. (2015b). Genre analysis as a pre-instructional, instructional, and teacher development framework. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.004.

Gledhill, C. (2000). The discourse function of collocation in research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), 115-135.