並列摘要
Go is an ancient and exotic Chinese invention, which origin is related to the astronomy, the Book of Changes, and the art of the war. There's no conclusion so far due to its mysteries and variations. What is the essence and content of Go from the broad observation apart from its practical functions? Is it a game or a sport? Is it a science or an art? How Go is positioned from ancient tradition to modern knowledge classification? Go is originally popular in East Asia, but now it's been developed worldwide by continuously growing of the Go learning population since the last century. However, the essence of Go cannot be recognized clearly by the public because of its mysterious connotation. Scholars advocate Go respectively with little intersection. In this thesis, Go is made research from math, science, art , game, sport, and the education of multiple intelligences, respectively, to well understand the essence and content of Go in a deep and extensive way, and to clarify the various and complicated arguments.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 王友信（1968）。我國桌球運動的檢討與矚望－兼論世界桌球技術的現勢及趨向。師友月刊，(9)，25-+31。https://doi.org/10.6437/EM.196803.0025
- 蕭振邦（2005）。讀《中的精神：圍棋之神吳清源自傳》：試評大國手圍棋人生。鵝湖學誌，(34)，189-211。https://doi.org/10.29653/LS.200506.0005
- 何忠鋒、胡雲雯、李建明、周資眾（2010）。綜論桌球運動的源流與發展。屏東教大體育，(13)，319-325。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000545-201002-201005210056-201005210056-319-325
- 杜立民（2010）。A Research on the Oversea Performance。管理實務與理論研究，4(3)，179-195。https://doi.org/10.29916/JMPP.201009.0011
- 潘世尊（2004）。The Prerequisite of Action Research。國民教育研究集刊，(12)，163-177+179。https://doi.org/10.7038/BREE.200412_(12).0009