教師工會與勞動三法

A Study of Teachers' Union and Three Labor Laws

衛民(Michael M. Wei)

《就業與勞動關係季刊》 2期 (2010/08) Pp. 36-53

https://doi.org/10.6674/TWELRQ.201008_(2).0002

摘要

根據新修正通過的「工會法」規定，教師已可組織教師工會，本文探討教師工會與新的「工會法」、「團體協約法」和「勞資爭議處理法」等勞動三法之間的關餘，針對11條有疑義的條文進行分析與討論。如果跟一般勞工相比較，教師的團結權、協商權和罷工權是不完整的。教師雖可組織工會，但不可組成學校教師工會，同時也不可以罷工。公立學校簽訂團體協約、出席調解、簽署調解書及申請仲裁，都必須先獲得上級主管機關的核可，此種規範有礙教師工會與公立學校的互動。本文認為行政院勞工委員會應針對教師及產業的範疇加以界定，以促進教師工會的籌組，並且應准許教師工會在學校設立分會以及在集體協商出現僵局時設置糾察線。

關鍵字

工會法 ； 教師工會 ； 勞資爭議處理法 ； 團體協約法

並列摘要

Teachers may organize a union according to the new Trade Union Law. This paper used content analysis to explore the relationship between teachers' union and three labor laws, namely, Trade Union Law, Collective Agreement Law, and Labor Dispute Settlement Law. Comparing with the workers in the private sector, teachers' rights to organize, bargain, and strike are not complete. Teachers may not organize a school union and may not strike either. Public school should get the permission from the educational authorities when signing a collective agreement, attending mediation, and accepting mediation result. These regulations will blockade the interaction between the teachers' union and public school. Council of Labor Affairs should define ＂teacher＂ and ＂industry＂ earlier in order to facilitate the organizing of teachers' union. Teachers' union may set up a branch union in the school and may picket the school for the collective bargaining impasse.

並列關鍵字

Collective Agreement Law ； Labor Dispute Settlement Law ； Teachers' Union ； Trade Union Law