透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.250.114
  • 期刊

理想與現實的落差:偏遠國中實施九年一貫課程的困惑與處境

Gaps between Ideal and Reality: The Doubts and Situations of Rural Junior High Schools in the Implementation of the Nine-Year Integrated Curriculum

摘要


課程的改革與變動,必須要具體評估其所產生的效益,才能判斷其改革的價值與意義,也才能據以推動進一步的改進與修正。九年一貫課程實施多年以來,雖有許多論文著述檢討九年一貫課程政策及其實務問題,但較少有以實徵評鑑研究確實評估九年一貫課程政策的實際成效與影響者,而有關偏遠地區九年一貫課程實施現況的調查研究,則更是付之闕如。本研究主要透過焦點小組座談方式,分區訪談全省各地偏遠國中教務主任,藉以了解九年一貫課程的實施對偏遠國中的課程實踐所產生的衝擊,及其對學生學習所產生的影響。根據焦點小組座談資料的分析,本文從實務層面所產生的困惑、配套措施所衍生的問題、學生學習所浮現的現象等三個層面,來討論偏遠國中實施九年一貫課程後的處境,藉之反省、檢討改革理想與現實產生落差的因素,並提出一些相關改進建言。

並列摘要


After any curriculum change or reform, it IS necessary to assess its actual impacts. Based on such assessments, the revision and improvement of the curriculum will then be possible. However, since years of implementation of the Nine-Year Integrated Curriculum, there have been few empirical evaluative studies of its actual effects and influences. By contrast, there have been lots of articles criticizing the reform policy and its consequences. Particularly, there was almost no study concerned with its critical impacts on rural schools. Through focus group interviews with practitioners of rural junior high schools from all over Taiwan, this study tried to understand the effects of the curriculum reform policy on pedagogical practices and student learning. The authors addressed their discovery in terms of doubts in practice, problems of supporting measure s, and phenomena of student learning. Furthermore, gaps between reform ideal and pedagogical reality are critically examined, and suggestions for policy evaluation and improvement are also provided.

參考文獻


甄曉蘭(2007)。偏遠國中教育機會不均等問題與相關教育政策初探。教育研究集刊。53(3),1-35。
Darling-Hammond, L.,J. A. Banks(Eds.),G. A. M. Banks (Eds.)(2001).Handbook of research on multicultural education.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Hung, L. Y.,Su, Y. F.(2009).Applying the simple view of reading into the assessment of reading competence of secondary students.Paper presented at the 4th Symposium on Quality Education National Taiwan Normal University.(Paper presented at the 4th Symposium on Quality Education National Taiwan Normal University).:
Kliebard, H. M.(2002).Changing courses: American curriculum reform in the 20th century.New York:Teachers College Press.
McKay, V.(Eds.),Treffgame, C.(Eds.)(1999).Evaluating impact.London:Education Department, Department for International Development.

被引用紀錄


羅友宏(2020)。戲劇融入英語教學之行動研究-以桃園市一國小六年級為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu202000879
陳順吉(2015)。桃園市高中數學教師對99高中數學課程綱要意見之調查研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201500631
郭冠麟(2010)。課程理念論述及其實踐轉化問題之研究〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2010.00250
邱于真(2021)。從歷史制度主義觀點探討地方政府推動學習扶助政策之在地實踐〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101801
張良丞、許添明、吳新傑(2016)。國民中學適足教育經費:臺灣偏遠與非偏遠地區學校的比較教育科學研究期刊61(3),43-67。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).02

延伸閱讀