This case study is a discourse analysis of a/the "Anti-corruption, depose- Chen" campaign's framing and agenda building strategies. The seven major issues used as the foundation of the research were abstracted from three newspapers: The China Times, United Daily News and The Liberty Times, and contents of the official campaign website. The research finds that when an organization is framing a social campaign, the framing of the situation is the first strategy used for positioning and linking the publics. The second strategy is the framing of attributes and risky choices; this strategy augments, consolidates and strengthens the appeal of the movement. The third strategy is the framing of responsibility, specifying who should be responsible for the status quo. The final strategy is framing of action, which encourages publics to take action. With these strategies, the organization can transform their appeal into issues with news value. When news reports appear in the media, the strategy of framing of issues have been successfully achieved. Unlike previous studies, this research is the first of its kind to utilize a "sources vs. media" perspective to study the framing strategy of a campaign. It also explores how sources utilize their privileged media access to build media agenda to meet their campaign purpose.