宋團隊省政危機處理機制之研究（1993-1998）

Case study on the crisis treatmental mechanism of James Soong’s provincial team《1993--1998》

鍾起岱(Chii-day Chung)

指導教授 ： 彭錦鵬

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/政治學研究所/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.00222

摘要

一個政治團隊之被稱為團隊，除了與政治權力有關之外，經常與危機事件的危機處理有關，這些危機事件的處理都直接影響到政治領導人的能力與聲望；如能對相關的團隊進行有系統的危機處理研究，除了有助於增進自我的危機處理智能外，相信必然可以豐富危機處理的實務與理論的研究。
危機通常有許多種型態：自然危機、人為危機、政治危機、社/經危機等等，這些危機也經常考驗政治人物的危機處理能力，本論文主要以二十世紀九零年代，台灣最重要的政治人物之ㄧ宋楚瑜先生主持台灣省政的將近六年期間（1993—1998）的危機處理為對象，進行研究。
1993年2月，宋楚瑜從一個被形容為《大內高手》、《翻雲覆雨》的執政黨秘書長，轉任被形容為《外放邊陲》、《遠離政治核心》的台灣省政府主席，近六年的時間，宋楚瑜一步步的邁向權力的頂峰，甚至迫使李登輝總統不得不與民進黨聯手，進行《廢省滅宋》的憲政改造，風起雲湧，宋楚瑜先生在政壇的起落，與其危機處理有絕對的關係。
本研究屬於歷史事件的研究，採取的研究方法主要是文獻比較法，本研究搜集宋楚瑜擔任台灣省主席及台灣省長的這段長達六年的時間（1993/02—1998/12）所發生的131件危機事件，挑出其中最具代表性的四大危機事件的處理，包括：賀伯風災（自然危機）、衛爾康大火（人為危機）、黃義交緋聞事件（核心幕僚危機）、精省事件（政治危機），分析現代社會危機處理機制應具備的功能，解答政治領導人的宦海沉浮與民間聲望，與其危機處理能力的關聯性，同時解析危機處理機制的不同處理策略，以及宋團隊的危機處理機制的啟示，歸納宋團隊危機處理機制的原則，作為危機處理實務之借鏡，期能建立理想的、可操作的危機處理機制。

關鍵字

宋團隊 ； 危機管理 ； 危機處理 ； 台灣省政府 ； 精省

並列摘要

A “political group” was named “political team” always because of the political power, and always because of the ability of the managing and treating crisis events. That means how to treat and control crisis direct influence the reputation of the political leaders. If we research a set of such cases study, no only improve the intelligence of the crisis’s treatments, and also can rich our research on the practices and theories of crisis treatment
There are various crises, including natural crisis, man-made crisis, political crisis, socio-economic crisis, which tests political leader’s ability of the crisis treatments, This thesis focuses on Mr. James Soong, one of the most important Taiwan politician in the 1990s, whose crisis transaction history during his six-year leading Taiwan Provincial Government term from 1993 to 1998.
In February 1993, James Soong ( aka ‘Da-nei Grand Master’, ‘As Changeable as Clouds and Rain’ ), the Secretary-General position of ruling party, had been transferred to the so called ’send an official for borderland, away from the core of politics’ Governor of Taiwan Province. In 1993-1998, James Soong marched toward the very top of power, and forced President Lee Teng-hui to cooperate with the DPP to engage in the so called ‘Abolish Province Destroy Soong’ constitutional reform. Obviously, the ability to transact crises is the major element of James Soong’s abrupt rising.
James Soong was appointed to be the 14th governor of Taiwan province at February, 1993, He was high-speed to rise in Taiwan Political circle in 6 years from 1993-1998, when he march toward the remarkable way to the power’s peak, bring about the KMT and the DDP collaborate to proceed the constitution amendment to freeze the function of Taiwan province government. James Soong’s high-speed to rise absolutely something related to his ability to control the crisis event.
This study belongs historical events research, esearcher use documental and literature comparative approach in case study. It is based on four major crises, Typhoon Herb disaster (natural crisis), Welcome Restaurant of Taichung fire accident (man-made crisis), Hwang Yih-jiau sex scandal (core staffs crisis), and Simplify Province incident --deprive function of TPG (political crisis) among 131 crises during James Soong’s six-year Taiwan Provincial Government service. This study, analyzes the essential functions of contemporary society’s crisis transaction mechanism, explaining the relationship between public fame and crisis transaction ability of a political leader, and resolving the various strategies of crisis transaction, inducting the principles of crisis treatmental mechanism used by Team Soong, which is possible for a lesson of crisis treatmental mechanism and for establishing an ideal, usable crisis treatmental mechanism.

並列關鍵字

Team Soong ； Crisis Management ； Crisis treatment

參考文獻

鍾起岱，2006。九二一重建特別預算之研究。台北：台灣大學管理學院高階公共管理組碩士論文。

童孝農、陳勁甫，2006。影響人員偵測組織危機警訊因素之探討，台北：危機管理月刊第3卷第2期。

裴文、李景隆，2006。I.A.P.E軍事危機管理模式–以陸軍軍事危機管理運用成效為例，台北：危機管理學刊第三卷第一期。

宋楚瑜（1996）：賀伯颱風災情及處理措施報告。台北：中國國民黨中央常務委員會報告。民國85年8月7日

黃鉦堤，2006。盧曼的風險社會學與政策制定。台北：政治科學論叢第28期。