我國陸生政策之研究：從民進黨派系政治觀察

The policy of Taiwanese Government of the Mainland students: Perspectives from Factionalism of Democratic Progressive Party

張凱棠(Kai-Tang Chang)

指導教授 ： 吳秀玲

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/國家發展研究所/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00490

摘要

「陸生政策」是整體大陸政策之一環，涉及大陸事務、國家安全、入出境、勞工法規等層面的複雜性；兩岸的內部情勢與外在環境存在諸多的問題，使得朝野各方對於政策難有不同看法與期待。而對民進黨而言，內部也同樣存在著意見分歧的問題，有人認為政策太過開放，有人卻認為政策過於保守而需要調整。本文嘗試著從派系的角度來探討，陸生政策的修正與否是與其派系競爭相關性。本文透過政黨的控制力與派系的自主性，建立一政黨、派系的結盟目標，在這目標下，我們來觀察派系可能的結盟狀況以及政策產出情形。

在研究發現上，首先民進黨在其陸生政策上態度的變化由執政時期的反對，到政策施行後的保留在到《2014對中政策檢討紀要》的善待，顯示民進黨在政策態度上卻有所轉變。其次，現階段民進黨內派系對於陸生「打工」、「健保」等議題上則有不同的看法；而目前民進黨對陸生政策上，已得到名稱上的共識─「陸生」。此外，在派系政治方面，民進黨內一直存在著「交流派」與「保守派(獨派)」兩方實力，而目前「交流派」實力已逐漸形成、壯大；而派系間的結盟狀況也關係到民進黨在陸生政策上的變化。

面對日趨密切的交流活動，教育「兩岸化」更是不可忽視的課題，政策上的限縮並非一勞永逸之可行之策，如何發揮台灣的教育品質優勢，在兩岸文教交流間創造軟實力，以正面積極推動陸生政策是未來執政者更需思考的重點。

關鍵字

民進黨 ； 派系政治 ； 大陸政策 ； 陸生政策 ； 策略選擇

並列摘要

“Policy of Mainland Chinese Students Studying in Taiwan” has been a part of the overall Mainland policy, involving complicated aspects such as Mainland affairs, national security, immigration/emigration, and regulations of labors. Numerous problems have existed in the internal situations as well as the external environment across the strait, thus leading to different perspectives and expectations among the political parties. To Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), discrepancies in the policy also exist, with some thinking the policy too open while others considering it too conservative and thus requiring further amendments. The current study, based on different faction angles, attempted to investigate if the amendments to the policy were related to the competition among factions. The current study established a coalition of political parties and factions via the control force of the political party and the autonomy of the faction, under which potential coalition and policy output were observed.
The results revealed DPP’s changes to “Policy of Mainland Chinese Students Studying in Taiwan”—from the opposition as the ruling party, to their taking the policy with a grain of salt after the implementation of the policy, and finally to the hospitality in “2014 Mainland Policy Review: Summary Report”. In addition, factions in DPP held different perspectives on the part-time job and health insurance of Mainland Chinese students. To “Policy of Mainland Chinese Students Studying in Taiwan”, DPP has reached a consensus of its term—Mainland Chinese students. In terms of factionalism, furthermore, the “Communicative Group” and the “Conservative (Independent) Group” have existed in DPP, with the “Communicative Group” currently growing in strength. Factional coalitions affected DPP’s attitude towards “Policy of Mainland Chinese Students Studying in Taiwan”.
As cross-strait interactions become increasingly close, “cross-straitization” of education has become an issue that cannot be neglected. Diminution in policies cannot always be feasible act once and for all. The ruling party has to ponder deeply how to optimize the advantages of educational qualities of Taiwan, to create soft power during cross-strait cultural and educational interactions, and to promote “Policy of Mainland Chinese Students Studying in Taiwan” with a positive attitude.

並列關鍵字

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ； factionalism ； Mainland policy ； Policy of Mainland Chinese Students Studying in Taiwan ； Strategic Choice

參考文獻

彭國華，2010，民進黨派系發展的政經分析，台北：國立台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。

吳榮鎮，2008，兩岸教育交流政策文化價值觀之評析，新形勢下的兩岸關係學術研討會論文集。

鄭明德，2012，預測民進黨下一個世代領導者，中華行政學報，11：63-72。

吳重禮，2008，《政黨與選舉》，台北：三民。

瞿宛文、洪嘉瑜，2002，自由化與企業集團化的趨勢，台灣社會研究季刊， 47；33-83。