透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.141.244.201
  • 學位論文

臺灣軍公教優惠存款制度之政治經濟分析1958~2011

The Political Economy of the Preferential Deposit for Military,Civil,and Teaching Personnel 1958~2011

指導教授 : 蕭全政
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文主要從實存的角度出發,探討臺灣軍公教優惠存款制度在國家發展的不同階段當中,與臺灣政經歷史脈絡的緊密鑲嵌性以及與社會環境的結構相連性,以統合的觀點觀察其全貌。 優存制度產生於威權統治時期,當時由國家機關強勢主導資源分配;威權轉型後各種社會力量蓬勃發展,威權下的特別權力關係與恩給式給付制度均隨之轉變,優存制度亦因應軍公教人員退撫新制之實施而採行斷源性措施。政黨輪替後,優存制度隨著利率下降、政府財政負擔沈重、人口結構高齡化之社會發展趨勢,以及軍公教人員待遇調整、實質所得提高,逐漸面臨改革壓力。而2006年至2011年間,先後進行三次退休所得合理化改革,顯示社會多元力量興起,對國家資源分配方式產生影響力。至於優存制度未來走向如何,仍須觀察第三次退休所得合理化改革方案之實施成效,並因應未來環境之變遷,妥為規劃。

並列摘要


This study aims to understand the relationship of the Preferential Rate Depositary System of militant and civil servants and the social economic structure under the different stages of national development in Taiwan. The history of the Preferential Rate Depositary System dated back in the authoritarian era when the government must dominate the distribution of national resources. However, during post authoritarian nation development, with the change of special power relationship and the merit benefit system, this system has been modified by off-resource measures in order to fulfill the new regulation for public service pension. After 2000, this system was under severe condition. Decreasing interest rate, increasing governmental financial burden, aging society and the increasing income of civil servants were important reasons for the reform. Three stages of Preferential Rate Depositary System reforms were made between 2006 and 2011, implying that the resource allocation has been influenced by the multi-social power. In order to meet future challenges, non-stop efforts should be made to reframe this system properly with the experience from the past three reforms.

參考文獻


劉憲璋,2008,軍公教優惠存款制度之法律問題,淡江大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
李日聰,1996,我國中央政府公共支出之研究:民國40年度至93年度,國立臺灣大學政治學系政府與公共事務碩士在職專班碩士論文。
吳嘉娟,2007,軍公教18%優惠存款制度之研究,臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
蘇威郎,2008,我國公務人員退休政策之政經分析(1945-2006),臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文。
黃世鑫、郭建中,2006,〈18%爭議之Q&A及合理改革之道〉,《政策研究學報》第6期:19-50。

被引用紀錄


劉世博(2015)。公務人員退休所得法制與信賴保護原則──以大法官解釋第717號為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00147

延伸閱讀