探討Well Building Standard指標應用之可行性-以富邦集團辦公大樓之用餐空間為標的

Study on the Feasibility of Well Building Standard Indicators-Research on the Dining Space of FUBON Group Office Building

潘英明(Ying-Ming Pan)

指導教授 ： 曾惠斌

國立臺灣大學/工學院/土木工程學研究所/碩士(2020年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202001006

摘要

本文以「WELL Building Standard健康建築認證」之發展及趨勢為研究背景，透過臺灣大型集團辦公大樓用餐空間之實際執行成果，擬定健康因子相關指標之在地化方針，同時檢視臺灣現有綠建築及智慧建築標章與健康因子之互動關係，並與研究標的之使用者經驗交叉驗證，提列各指標面向之優化建議。
近年來，「健康建築」一詞漸受關注，國際間對於建築設計之要求，已不僅以效能表現為首要項目，進而思索人本價值及如何提升環境使用者舒適度；使用者多數時間居於室內，室內環境品質係使用者身心靈感受最直接之媒介。因此，21世紀之建築物環境性能評估方法，除量化數值外，應漸次納入質性面向，並透過規範化及脈絡化過程，使「健康建築」產製通同性及地區性之標準。
本研究標的為「富邦集團幸福食堂計畫」2018年首批試行之二棟大樓，其用餐空間現地限制及使用人數比例各有不同。
第三章研究中，透過專家訪談及關鍵因素分析，可知理念倡議者、標章推動者、產業執行者間之觀點差異，尤以後兩者針對建築效率出現較大分歧；同時搭配適地之問卷設計及使用後評估方法，彙整預設之健康建築指標執行成效及使用者滿意度差異。
第四章研究發現，以歐美體系辦公空間為基礎所發展之WELL Building Standard健康建築認證第一版中所建議之各項細目指標屬性（必要項目P／優化項目O），與本研究標的現場使用者重視之指標略有不同，故可探知健康建築應用過程中之東西方差異，進而有產製在地化規範修正方向之重要性。
第五章結論彙整提出未來臺灣健康建築發展建議參酌之選用範疇，該範疇可茲為WELL Building Standard健康建築認證導入季風亞洲臺灣之切入點，其中包含臺灣現行規範系統及WELL Building Standard健康建築認證第二版趨勢等。

關鍵字

健康建築認證 ； 辦公大樓用餐空間 ； 企業社會責任 ； 使用後評估 ； 指標在地化

並列摘要

This study takes the development and trend of "WELL Building Standard" as the research background, and uses the current status of the dining space from well-known group’s office buildings in Taiwan to formulate localization indicators on health factors; at the same time, it examines the existing green building and smart building standards in Taiwan Interrelationship with health factors and cross-validation with the user experience, and recommendations for optimization of various indicators.
Recently, "well building" has attracted more and more attention. The international requirements for architectural design have not only focused on functions, but also considered human values and how to improve the comfort for users; Users spend most of their time indoors, so the quality of the indoor environment is directly related to the user's body and mentality. Therefore, in addition to quantitative values, the building environment performance evaluation method for the 21st century should also gradually incorporate qualitative aspects, and through standardized and background processes, "well buildings" will generate general and regional standards.
The study case is the two office buildings of Fubon Group’s “Healthy Diner” Project started 2018. The existing dining space is somehow limited, and the number of users is different.
In Chapter 3, through expert interviews and key factor analysis, it can be seen that the idea advocates, standard promoters, and industry implementers have different views, especially the last two have big differences on building efficiency. Through the questionnaire design and users' evaluation, the preset health building index implementation effectiveness and user satisfaction differences are compared.
Chapter 4 finds that the attributes of the indicators recommended in the WELL Building Standard (first edition) health building certification developed by the office space of the European and American systems (preconditions item P / optimizations item O) are somehow different concern from the local users, so we can know the difference between the east and the west, and then serve as the direction for the revision of localization regulations.
Chapter 5 summarizes the recommended reference range for the development of well buildings in Taiwan in the future. It can be used as an entry point for introducing WELL building standard into Taiwan, including the current Taiwan standard system and the WELL building standard version 2.

並列關鍵字

well building standard ； office building dining space ； corporate social responsibility ； post-occupancy evaluation ； localization of indicators

參考文獻

Amrita M., Investigation on Restaurant Layout Design, 2013.

ARUP奧雅納工程顧問有限公司台北分公司(2019)。健康建築簡介。

Brichfield, J., Design and Layout of Food Serviece Facilities., New Jersey: Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, 2008.

Christine M. Piotrowski & Elizabeth A. Rogers IIDA., Designing Commercial Interiors, 2007.

Craig M. Zimring & Janet E. Reizenstein, A Primer On Post-Occupancy Evaluation, 1981.