著作權仲介團體條例自民國86年11月5日公布施行至今,不論是團體本身或是主管機關都在摸索中成長,實務運作暴露出條例規範之不足,主管機關無法做到面面俱到,但是在幾個面向上應該可以做到把關、過濾的功能,分述如下: 一、著作權仲介團體之許可設立之申請門檻,涉及仲介團體數量之多寡。 二、著作權仲介團體與會員簽訂之管理契約內容,涉及授權之多樣性及彈性。 三、著作權仲介團體使用報酬率之適合性與適當性,涉及收費是否合理,以及授權是否靈活等。 四、著作權主管機關對仲介團體之監督輔導獎助之權責,涉及仲介團體能否汰弱換強。 本文即針對上述四個面向進行現行法、比較法、修正草案進行檢討與借鏡,並提出建議。
Since Copyright Intermediary Organization Act has been implemented from November 5th, 1997, the practical operation of the Act has revealed the lack of norms, even if the CIO and the authority are trying to set on the wheels. Although the authority can not do everything, it should be able to act as a guardian in some aspects which stated as follows: First, the approval of CIO establishment, the number of CIOs involved in the amount of real estate. Second, the contents of CIO signed management agreements with members, involving authorization of diversity and flexibility. Third, the CIO rate of royalty’s fitness and property, involving the reasonableness of charges, the flexibility of authorization or not. Fourth, the copyright authority’s powers and responsibilities of rewarding, assistance and supervision to CIO, involved in eliminating the weaker CIO in exchange for the better ones. In this thesis, according to the above four aspects, to conduct the review and learn from the existing law, comparative law, draft amendment, and to make recommendations.