透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.47.14
  • 學位論文

具生產性政府支出模型下,探討社會地位、累進稅率對總體穩定性及成長之影響

Social Status, Progressive Taxation, Macroeconomic (In)Stability, and Growth with Productive Government Spending

指導教授 : 陳虹如

摘要


本篇論文利用具生產性政府支出的外生成長模型和內生成長模型,探討社會地位及累進稅率對總體經濟長期穩定性及成長之影響。家計單位累積資本不僅是追求資本本身所帶來消費能力的提升,更是為了提升社會地位進而累積資本。然而,投資動機也會受所得稅的累進程度影響。本研究發現,在外生成長模型中,當家計單位較在乎自身的社會地位時,會累積較多的資本,進而使產出增加;當稅率更為累進時,會導致社會的投資及產出下降。在內生成長模型中,家計單位追求社會地位會促使經濟成長;然而,更高的累進稅制會對經濟成長產生負面的影響。在總體經濟穩定性方面,外生成長模型的收斂路徑為唯一的馬鞍路徑,此路徑不受在乎社會地位程度及累進稅率所影響。內生成長模型的穩定性受所得稅率水準、政府支出外部性程度及稅率累進程度所影響。

並列摘要


This paper has theoretically investigated the effects of households’ desires for social status and progressive income taxation on economic growth and stability properties in exogenous- and endogenous-growth models with productive government spending. Households accumulate capital not only for their implied consumption, but for the resulting social status; however, this motive for investment is also influenced by the degree of progressivity of the income tax. We found that in the exogenous-growth model, when households were relatively concerned about their social status, they accumulated more capital, thus promoting output; when the income tax became more progressive, it depressed the investment and output. In the endogenous-growth model, pursuing for social status drove economic growth, whereas a higher progressivity of the income tax harmed the rate of growth. On the other side, concerning the stability property, there was a saddle-path equilibrium which was proven unaffected by the spirit of capitalism and the progressive income tax in the exogenous-growth model. However, the stability of the endogenous-growth model was analytically determined by three factors below: (i) the level of the income tax schedule; (ii) the degree of productivity of government spending; and (iii) the extent of progressivity of the income tax.

參考文獻


[1] Abel, A.B., Blanchard, O.J., “An Intertemporal Model of Saving and Investment,” Econometrica, 51, 675-692, 1983.
[2] Atkinson, A.B., Stiglitz, J.E., Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
[4] Barro, R.J., “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 98, S103-S125, 1990.
[5] Bond, E.W., Wang, P., Yip, C.K., “A General Two-Sector Model of Endogenous Growth with Human and Physical Capital: Balanced Growth and Transitional Dynamics,” Journal of Economic Theory, 68, 149-173, 1996.
[6] Campbell, J.Y., “Understanding Risk and Return,” Journal of Political Economy, 104, 298-345, 1996.

延伸閱讀