透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.44.223
  • 學位論文

邁向企業城市? 台北市產業發展與都市再發展的政策與實質

Towards Entrepreneurialism? The Substance of Industrial Enactment in Taipei City

指導教授 : 徐進鈺

摘要


近十多年來,台北市數處興起都市再開發計畫,大多作為產業園區和公共設施為主要用途並與市政府有相當程度的關連。既有文獻多探討市政府在產業園區發展中扮演的角色,卻發現市政府不具關鍵主導能力,後續研究因而轉向市政府引導開發的動機與能力來源,提出振興房地產經濟是土地開發的啟動因素,而市政府的能力來自於在民選政治中取得的相對自主性,民選首長且利用都市計畫工具推動土地開發。本文在上述基礎之上,試圖更深入分析市政府如何運用都市計畫工具和地方自治法令來協助開發。另外,本文也以台北市自定的兩次產業發展條例為分析主軸,說明產業條例和土地開發的關聯,以及產業條例內涵與轉變。研究結果發現,第一次產業條例主要用於公有土地開發,輔以「委託條例」、「促參法」以及都市計畫工具,推動市內多起大型開發案。第二次的產業條例方向明顯轉向扶植中小企業,配合相關單位的政策規劃與執行,市政府較先前致力於產業發展,其條例卻依舊帶有園區用地規劃的意味。相較於歐美都市企業主義的治理轉型,台北市近年的產業發展與園區開發策略可視為民選市長尋求政績和都市房地產經濟下的政策運用。

並列摘要


In the recent decade, numerous planning and regeneration across Taipei city has been proposed. Most of the plans proposed the construction of industry zones and public facilities and displayed connection with city government. Current literature mainly focused on the function that the city government played during the development of industry zone. The results indicated that city government lacked leading competence in this issue, actually, the later studies shifted the research directions and suggested that boosting the real estate and property was the real reason underlying the initiation of land development. The capacity for the city government to promote the land development is derived from the political autonomy endowed by democratic election and enabled the elected governors to utilize the city plans as the means to promote land development. In this study, the deep analysis of how the city government utilizes city plan as well as acts of regional autonomy to assist land development was carried out. The main axis of analysis was based on the two industry development acts proposed by the Taipei city. The purpose of the analysis was to figure out the relationships among industry-related acts, land development and the content and evolution of industry acts. Our results suggested that the first industry act was mainly applied to land development, along with other associated acts and the means for city plans, this act promoted plenty of large-scale development cases in Taipei city. The direction of second industry act obviously shifted to the supportive assistance for the SMEs. Combined with the policy planning and execution of the associated units, the city government furthered the devotion to industry development, despite the act remained entangled with planning for establishment of industry zone. Compared to the transformation of management in contemporary western cities, which is often associated with entrepreneurism, directions of industry development and industry zone development strategies could be seen as the means for the elected mayors to compile governance credits as well as the products of real estate economics in Taipei cities in recent years.

參考文獻


朱凌毅(2004)「浮現中的地方發展型國家?台北內湖科技園區與上海張江高科技園區的比較研究」,台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
江尚書(2009)「新自由主義化下的都市再發展:以台北車站特定專用區為例」,台灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。
王秋原、李炫逸、趙建雄(2008)台北內湖科技園區發展對都市結構變遷之影響,華岡地理學報,第22期,第1-24頁。
吳秀光、吳宗憲 (2008)台北市政府促進民間參與公共建設政策之研究,政策研究學報,第8期,第23-75頁。
麻匡復、邊泰明(2006),無須政府的產業群聚?內湖科技園區發展的公共領域與制度變遷,公共行政學報,第20期,第1-32頁。

延伸閱讀