婚姻之置疑與解構，兼論新型態伴侶關係

Questioning and Deconstructing Marriage - Discussion on a Type of New Partnership

黃子寧(Tzu-Ning Huang)

指導教授 ： 陳妙芬

國立臺灣大學/法律學院/法律學研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10783

摘要

現行婚姻不論在制度還是意義面向皆存在著許多缺失，更壟斷親密關係之合
法性，造成對非婚伴侶的排斥與否定。婚姻被塑造成理想結合的唯一典範，目的
是為了維護社會統一秩序，而這正是一種規範性暴力(normative violence)。

既然現行婚姻已面臨崩盤，神聖意義盡失，何不對其提出批判及解構，分析
婚姻背後的權力網絡與意識型態運作，透過把問題「陌生化」(defamiliarization)、將既有觀念「懸置」(epoche)方式，對其意義結構抽絲剝繭以釐清婚姻的真相，並認知它並非自然之物。在矯正習非成是的錯誤觀念，揚棄歷史進步論之後，婚姻無法繼續倚仗時間給予的正當性，已非不證自明之存在，它只是一人為、有目的性的「社會控制」機制，對於個人慾望進行符碼化，只為確保人類永續繁衍與建構社會中的性秩序。婚姻所表現的內涵是一種共通價值，因過於單一性的詮釋人類情感關係而導致獨斷與僵化，最終造成婚姻中的歧義與矛盾，還有主體性的消融。

在親密關係中，個體性必需被看見，才不會迫使情感被化約與扭曲，透過新
型態伴侶以一種嶄新的關係與精神作為抵禦外在規範性壓迫的力量，拒絕模仿主
流，從同到異，以多元伴侶取代制式夫妻，不只解放傳統婚姻也不再替家之型態
設限，透過自我關注與實踐，取回自決讓欲望回歸自然。

關鍵字

婚姻 ； 伴侶法 ； 非典型家庭 ； 解構 ； 權力 ； 規範化 ； 意識型態

並列摘要

Today's marriage, whether the institution or implication is imperfect, and it also monopolizes the legitimacy of the intimacy. Result in the rejects and the negatives of domestic partner. Marriage was constructed to an ideal
type of a paeter relationship,and the result is keeping the society in order.However, this is a normative violence.

Since marriage nowadays has already destroyed and the divine worth has completely disappeared. We should put forward criticism and deconstruction of it. Analysis of marital power behind and ideology of operation. Pass through of the problem defamiliarization and the existing concept of suspension. Analysis of significance to clarify the structure of marriage. And we acknowledge that marriage is not natural.

To redress the misconception of“Used as the correct”. Abandon the Idea of Progressive History. The legitimacy of the marriage can not continue to rely on historical justification of existence. The Marriage is no longer an exist that is self-evident, it only a tool of social control that is artificial and purposeful. For the code of the individual desire, only in order to ensure the reproduction of human forever and sexual order in society.

The content of marriage is a common value, because it is too unified to explan the human beings relationships, so it lead to dictatorial and rigid.Finally, it cause the ambiguity and contradiction of marriage, and makes people to lost their subjectivity.

In intimacy, the individuality must be seen, so we can avoid the emotion to typified and distorted. Pass through of a type of new partner and as a power to resist the normative violence. Do not copy the mainstream culture, to replace marriage companion. Not only liberate the traditional
marriage but also open the type of home. Through of self-attention and self-realization to retrieve self-determination, and make the desire to return to nature.

並列關鍵字

marriage ； partnership ； family diversity ； deconstruction ； poewr ； normation ； ideology

參考文獻

簡至潔。《從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」- 朝向親密關係

李震山(2004)。〈憲法意義下的家庭權〉，《中正大學法學集刊》，16

陳昭如 (2010)。〈婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權〉，《女學學

Michel Foucault(1979) ，Discipline and Punish: The Birth of

洪屏芬(2009)。《從同姓不婚與同性不婚看婚姻法制上的遞嬗》。國