透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.129.19
  • 學位論文

「做個就業好公民」的身心障礙者就業促進論述-以建制民族誌觀點分析

To be a hard-working citizen:An institutional ethnography study of the employment discourse for people with disability

指導教授 : 林萬億
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文從作者工作的斷裂經驗為研究出發點,探討促進障礙者就業政策下,何以障礙者的就業處境沒有改善。藉由建制民族誌為研究途徑,以求職困難的障礙者為研究立足點,描述參與就業促進的行動者是如何執行就業服務及如何選擇,並分析何種力量影響各個行動者的決定,釐清促進障礙者就業的措施何以仍使障礙者深陷於低薪及低技術性的職場。 透過建制民族誌的分析,本研究具體的結論包括:(1)、政府、教育制度及專家體系,不斷推銷就業好公民的形象,說服家庭選擇符合社會價值的決定。(2)、由於福利服務資源不足或無法負擔,使家庭更努力的配合學校及專業人員的安排。(3)、專家與專業人員深受家庭信任與依賴,成為具公信力的說服者,影響家庭的決定,而專業組織受到政府合約的束縛,在有限的時間內,只能選擇低技術及低勞動條件的職場安置障礙者。最後,在這些行動者的協作下,強化了社會價值加諸於障礙者身上的期望,更續行了就業排除,使障礙者無法藉由就業真正融入社會。   本研究認為要回應障礙者社會參與的期待,應發展適足的資源,實務工作者應回到以人為本的核心概念下,思考障礙者需要的多元服務,才能打破建構障礙者就業的權力地圖,重構障礙者社會參與的路徑。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study, based on the author’s personal experiences of disjuncture in her professional career, is to explore reasons for the employment promotion measures’ failure to improve the career situation of persons with severe disabilities. Drawing upon institutional ethnography, the author portrayed the actors involved in the process, and analyzed factors influencing those actors’ decisions. The aim is to disclose why, even with so many employment promotion measures, persons with disabilities are still trapped in low-paid and low-skilled jobs. The author argued in her analysis that:(1) the government, the education and the professional system promote an image of hard-working citizens and they persuade families with children with disabilities to make decisions meeting this social expectation;(2) due to the lack of and/or the unaffordable social services, those families work hard to follow the arrangement by schools and professionals;(3) the experts and professionals influence families’ decisions because of the deep trust in them by the families plus the persuasiveness they demonstrate. However, the employment services providers have been constrained by outsourcing contracts, which produce only low-skilled jobs for the disabled jobseekers for limited working periods. The social expectation imposed on persons with disabilities were further intensified by these actors working closely with one another. The whole process hence continues to exclude people with disabilities from mainstream labor markets rather than to promote the inclusion and participation.

參考文獻


張恆豪、蘇峰山(2009)。〈戰後台灣國小教科書中的障礙者意象分析〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,42期,143-188。
沈詩涵(2008)。《精神障礙者在就業服務中的復原與復健》,臺灣大學碩士論文。
張嘉文(2011)。〈臺灣特殊教育的麥當勞化〉,《特殊教育季刊》,120,37-44。
關婉珍、陳靜江(2001)。〈支持策略在支持性就業中之應用情形與成效分析〉,《特殊教育學報》,15期,21-48。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、李志偉、吳佳玲(2002)。〈智能障礙者醫療需求與就醫障礙:以專家面向分析〉,《臺灣家庭醫學雜誌》,12(3), 111-120。

被引用紀錄


王怡人(2007)。變遷中的縣市政府社會工作實務:1990年代的北縣經驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.01402
黃珉蓉(2011)。臺灣倡議型非營利聯盟組織之興起與發展-以殘障聯盟為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2608201113064700

延伸閱讀