透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.200.197
  • 學位論文

誰的他者?──中時、聯合、自由筆下的美國攻伊論述

Whose “the Other” ? The Discourse of Second Gulf War in Taiwan's Three Major Newspapers: China Times, United Daily, Liberty Times

指導教授 : 陳慧蓉
共同指導教授 : 莊錦農

摘要


Said點出文化霸權下的東方主義現象:西方掌握對東方的詮釋權,而在國際傳播的相關研究中亦發現媒體間議程設定現象:第一世界媒體設定各國媒體的議程。在台灣媒體報導國際新聞高度仰賴外電的情況下,台灣三大報對於「美國醞釀出兵伊拉克」的報導是否受到國際傳播中,媒體間議程設定的影響,並進而複製了第一世界媒體的他者再現? 本論文透過新聞主題與消息來源統計,以及批判論述分析進行探究,發現:三大報對於此事件的報導的確受到特定地區、特定媒體,也就是美國媒體,尤其是《紐約時報》及《華盛頓郵報》的議程設定。並且在龐大文化支配結構的影響下,三大報沿用第一世界支配伊拉克的觀點,誤認我們與第一世界同屬相對於伊斯蘭「他者」(the Other)的「同一」(the same)身份位階。不過,三大報亦大量引用本地記者與特派記者的稿件,可見台灣媒體也試圖發展對國際事務的自主性觀點,並非一味接受第一世界的議程設定。

並列摘要


According to Said, the construction of Orientalism is operated under the mechanism of cultural hegemony -- where the West controls the power of interpretation toward “the Orient”. Researches in the field of international communication also found a similar operation in intermedia agenda-setting: the media of First world set agendas for the media of the Rest. While Taiwan’s media highly depend on foreign wire service on international news stories, it is possible that Taiwan’s three major newspapers are also affected by the international intermedia agenda-setting, and therefore duplicate First World media’s “representation of the Other” when reporting the stories on American government’s justification of sending out troops to Iraq. Through the methods of cross-table statistics on news themes and news sources, the applying critical discourse analysis to futher explore the discourse of “the Other” in Taiwanese newspapers reporting on the eve of the second Iraqi War, this thesis found that three major newspapers’ news agendas are indeed set by certain geo-political areas and certain media, which refers to US media, especially the New York Times and Washington Post when reporting this issue. Under international mass media system, the three major newspapers took the viewpoints that the First world have on Iraq, thinking that Taiwan is at “the same” world system status along with the First world, which regards the Islam as “the Other”. However, the three major newspapers also use a large number of articles by local journalists and correspondents, indicating that Taiwan’s media are also trying to develop autonomous viewpoints toward international affairs, not just receiving the agendas set by the First world.

參考文獻


李美華(2005)。〈從國際新聞流通理論探討台灣報紙國際新聞報導內容之轉變(1988~1999年)〉,《新聞學研究》,85: 111-139。
羅文輝(2004)。〈選擇可信度:1992及2002年報紙與電視新聞可信度的比較研究〉,《新聞學研究》,80:1-50。
倪炎元(1999)。〈再現的政治:解讀媒介對他者負面建構的策略〉,《新聞學研究》,58:85-111。電子版:http://www.jour.nccu.edu.tw/mcr/0058/05.html
翁秀琪、鍾蔚文、簡妙如、邱承君(1999)。〈似假還真的新聞文本世界:新聞如何呈現超經驗事件〉,《新聞學研究》,58:59-83。電子版:http://www.jour.nccu.edu.tw/mcr/0058/04.html
de Beer, A. S. (2004). News: The fleeting, elusive but essential feature of global journalism, in A. S. de Beer & J. C. Merrill (Eds.), Global Journalism: Topical issues and media systems. U.S.A.: Pearson.

被引用紀錄


蕭裕民(2010)。國際新聞論述之競逐與反思:以批判性論述分析透視Al-Jazeera與CNN「以巴衝突」之國族建構策略〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2010.01126
陳涵文(2017)。從多元文化觀點檢視國際族群衝突報導:以佛格森事件為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703882
葉思敏(2013)。美國菁英報<<華盛頓郵報>>與<<華爾街日報>>如何報導2001-2008年小布希執政時期有關美中台關係報導之分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10156

延伸閱讀