透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.67.149
  • 學位論文

An Essay on Game Theory: Rationalizable Behavior under Coalitional Interactions

An Essay on Game Theory: Rationalizable Behavior under Coalitional Interactions

指導教授 : 羅曉

摘要


無資料

並列摘要


We extend Ambrus’s [QJE, 2006] concept of “coalitional rationalizability (c-rationalizability)” to situations where, in seeking mutual beneficial interests, players in groups (i) make use of Bayes rule in expectation calculations and (ii) contemplate various deviations –i.e. the validity of deviation is checked against any arbitrary sets of strategies, not only against restricted subsets of strategies. In this paper we offer an alternative notion of c-rationalizability suitable for such complicated interactions. More specifically, following Bernheim’s [Econometrica 52(1984), 1007-1028] and Pearce’s[Econometrica 52(1984), 1029-1051] approach, we define c-rationalizability by the terminology “coalitional rationalizable set (CRS)”. Roughly speaking, a CRS is a product set of pure strategies from which no group of player(s) would like to deviate. We show that this notion of c-rationalizability possesses nice properties similar to those of conventional rationalizability. We also provide its epistemic foundation. JEL Classification: C70, C72, D81

並列關鍵字

Rationalizability Coalition Bayes Updating

參考文獻


1. D.S. Ahn, Hierarchies of ambiguous beliefs, mimeo, UC_Berkeley, 2006.
2. A. Ambrus, Coalitional rationalizability, forthcoming in: QJE (2006).
5. R.J. Aumann, Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games, in: Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, Princeton University Press, 1959.
6. R.J. Aumann, Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies, JME 1(1974), 67-96.
7. R.J. Aumann, Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality, Econometrica 55(1987), 1-18.