建築專案管理技術服務計費問題之研究

Study on the Reasonable Service fee for Professional Construction Management (PCM) of Public building Projects

王冠文(Kuan-Wen Wang)

指導教授 ： 郭斯傑

國立臺灣大學/工學院/土木工程學研究所/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02967

摘要

工程採購主辦機關為編列預算方便，並未考量廠商提供勞務服務與工程性質、勞務服務工作內容之相對成本關係，大多以「建造費用百分比法」作為給付服務費之計算方式。實務上，因目前國內公共工程預算標比約為82.41%，造成廠商無實際利潤可言。加上國內工程主辦機關，於採購契約條文訂定上，多超出技服辦法規定，且技服辦法自民國88年頒布施行至今，專案管理服務費率從未調整，又國內公共工程工期延宕狀況屢見不鮮，各種因素，造成專案管理廠商之勞務成本支出，補償無門。由於以上國內機關辦理委託專案管理技術服務採購之契約履約範疇及計費方式問題，導致專案管理廠商面臨服務費與實際履約成本顯有落差，是值得深入探討問題。
本研究經統計近三年專案管理技術服務標案公告標案提出經常採購機關於制定專案管理契約服務工作時常見之不合理情形，另就機關採購多偏愛採用建造百分比法，衍生之額外服務無法計費問題，及技術服務費率合理調整應考量因素提出看法建議，依據設計監造與專案管理服務間之計費關聯性及藉由實際執行案例研究，提出採用建造費用百分比法計費調整費率及短期間之因應對策建議，對於專案管理技術服務計費公平性，期有所助益。

關鍵字

建造費用百分比法 ； 專案管理 ； 經常採購機關

並列摘要

The authority of engineering procurement for budgeting convenient does not consider the vendors providing labor services with engineering properties and the relative cost related labor services content. Mostly, as a " Percentage of Construction Cost Method" to the payment service fee calculation.
In practice, because the current standard ratio of domestic public works budget is about 82.41%, that results manufacturers no real profit at all.
The domestic engineering authorities always set contract provisions of procurement beyond the technical requirements. Since 1999 the Technical Service Regulation implemented so far, project management service fees never been adjusted. On the other hand, domestic public construction period delayed with uncommon condition and caused by a variety of factors, that resulted in labor costs overrun and project management manufacturers compensated nowhere.
Because of these national authorities commissioned project management technology services procurement, which contract performance range and billing issues resulted project management service fees and actual compliance costs significantly there was a gap. Above all is worthy of further study.
This research statistics the last three years project management technical service bulletins tenders propose unreasonable conditions when regular procurement agencies made service contracts.
Then, this study reports recommendations two views, one is authorities more prefer applying the percentage of the construction method that additional services can not be derived from billing issues ,two is technical service rates should be considered a reasonable adjustment factor.
According to the billing relationship with the design , supervision and project management services, as well as the case studies, this paper proposed the suggestions about adjustment expenses for using the "Percentage of Construction Costs Method" and the billing fairness for project management technology services.

並列關鍵字

Percentage of construction costs ； project management ； regular procurement agencies

參考文獻

24.機關與各廠商間辦理公共工程之履約權責劃分表，行政院公共工程委員會，2002。

9.陳柔諭，「專業營建管理服務費計價模式之研究」，中央大學營建管理學系碩士論文，2011。

15.謝雅欣，「公共工程以建造費用百分比法計算設計監造酬金現況之研究」，中央大學營建管理學系碩士論文，2007。

12.黃依婷，「機關委託工程技術服務費率調整之研究」，中央大學營建管理學系碩士論文，2006。

1.王維志、王世旭、鄭淵源、李明聰、翁紹偉，「技術服務計費成本結構與國外計費制度之研析研發計畫成果報告」，台灣世曦工程顧問股份有限公司，委託研發計畫成果報告，臺北，2011。