警察機關政風與督察雙元課責模式之分析

Analysis of Government Ethics Department and Inspector Department in National Police Agency for Accountability.

陳昭伊(Chao-Yi Chen)

指導教授 ： 陳志瑋

淡江大學/管理學院/公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班/碩士(2011年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00372

摘要

警察風紀的良窳及廉潔的操守是人民對警察信任的關鍵，警察機關為提升警察風紀，由原只設置督察室改為督察、政風雙元課責模式，囿於警察機關不同於一般行政機關，其原已設置督察室督導員警風紀及貪瀆情事，因此目前採行政風、督察室並存之模式，是否存在業務重疊、資源浪費之問題，及此模式未來是否值得推廣至其他警察機關，都有待研究及探討。 關於警察機關設置政風及督察單位這兩種內部控制機制，在學理上可視為一種雙元課責模式，運用雙元課責模式基礎，瞭解政風及督察單位在執行和分工上的不同，尋找出警察機關有效而適當的內部控制機制，基此，本文之研究目的如下：一、探討政風及督察單位內部控制機制的良窳，並分別加以比較。二、探討同時設置政風及督察單位兩者之間產生的問題。三、探究政風及督察單位雙元課責模式推行至全國警察機關之必要性。 在研究方法上，本研究採以「文獻分析法」及「深度訪談法」，找出做為本研究之立論基礎並加以分析及歸納，整理出研究結果與建議，以達到研究目的。 研究結果發現，一、政風及督察單位業務權責尚稱明確，實務面部分業務重疊；二、要發揮原先預期設置政風單位端正警察風紀的效益，須從政風單位之人員編制及權限再做規劃；三、就瞭解機關運作情形及組織文化而言，警察機關內督察機制較政風機制適合發揮弊端揭發的角色；四、政風與督察單位在端正警察風紀之責任歸屬上，應避免差異化；五、署屬機關依據機關業務特性做規劃設置政風單位。 本研究對理論及個案以文獻探討及深度訪談得出的分析結果，整理研究者心得及受訪者意見，茲提出研究建議如下，作為未來實務機關應用之參考：一、建立政風與督察連繫平臺，強化雙向溝通機制；二、清楚劃分業務職掌，明確訂定法令作業規定；三、建立整合政風與督察情資系統，有效解決資源重疊等問題；四、強化政風及督察人員之專業能力，實施教育訓練或在職訓練，加強專業知識。

關鍵字

課責 ； 結構功能 ； 政風 ； 督察

並列摘要

Police officials with good moral standards and personal integrities are the keys to civilian’s trust and respect. For improving the police moral standards, the organization has set the ethics and inspection departments (dual mode) for police internal affairs. Because the police organization is different from the other administrative organizations, therefore will the new practice cause overlap of affairs or business and the waste of resources? Also is it worth to set the new practice to other law enforcement organizations or agencies in the future? All these will be studied and discussed.
About the inspection and ethics department’s internal control, in an academic study it’s been described as dual mode accountability. This foundation can be used to better understand the differences between the works, affairs or businesses of the department, and to find out the most suitable ways to govern the police organizations internally.
The purpose of this study mentioned above is stated in the following:
1.The internal control or governing of inspection and ethics department’s advantages and disadvantages.
2.To explore the problems or confusions that will occur for the departments.
3.Discussion of whether such implementation (dual mode accountability) within the Police organization is necessary.
This research uses the study methods of "documental analysis" and the "in-depth discussion" to find out its theoretical basis, analyze and conclusion to sort out the findings and recommendations to its purpose.
The results are as follows:
1.The inspection and ethics departments are fairly clear that some parts of work, business or affair do overlap.
2.To improve the moral standards, better ethics and personal integrities of the police department, the level of authority of the inspection and ethics needs to be increased within itself and rearrangement of personnel.
3.The inspection/ethics departments must understand, adapt and realize the operations of the police organization and culture. Police within its organization is more suitable to be the character of whistle-blower to bring out the outlaws within.
4.Avoid the level of responsibility difference in both departments (inspection and ethics). Responsibilities should be balance between the departments.
5.Ethics department should be implemented within each organization or department due to the difference of its business and the level of jobs it does.
In the research method, this study was done by "document analysis" and the "depth interview" to find out the theoretical basis of this study, analyzed and summarized, sorting out the findings and recommendations to the purpose.
The results obtained in this case study through the analysis and interviews are organized as the following recommendations and can be used as future reference for the organization. It could be used as a reference for better changes or improvements.
1.Establishing a system platform for strengthening the communication between inspection and ethics departments.
2.To clearly allocate job responsibilities and defined sets regulation in both departments to prevent and avoid conflicts.
3.Establishing a better internal information system to avoid overlaps of business or affair in both departments.
4.Improvement of personnel’s internal training, strength and to enrich its professional competence and knowledge as well for the respect of its doings.

並列關鍵字

Accountability ； Structural Functionalism ； Government Ethics ； Inspector

參考文獻

陳志瑋（2003，4月）。行政課責與地方治理能力的提升。政策研究學報，第4期，頁23-45。

葉至誠（1997）。「社會學」。台北：楊智。

王鴻烈（2008），「南投縣警察機關勤務指揮中心結構功能之研究」，暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系研究所碩士論文。

Flinders, M.V. (2005). The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State. London: Ashgate.

Harmon, Michael M. (1995). Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government. London: Sage Publications.