中國一帶一路戰略與16+1合作研究:以高堡四國為例

A Study on China’s OBOR Strategy and 16+1 Cooperation : Taking The Visegrad Group as Example

葉書豪(Shu-Hao, Yeh)

指導教授 ： 鄭欽模 博士

淡江大學/國際研究學院/歐洲研究所碩士班/碩士(2017年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00440

摘要

中國在 2013 年提出一帶一路戰略的概念,而 16+1 合作則是在

2011 年起逐漸成形,中國以這兩個看似有共通點又有差異的戰略,

將其與中東歐國家的關係不斷的加強深化,有什麼樣的意涵?在雙

邊關係深化的同時,處於重要戰略位置的高堡四國又是抱持著什麼

立場?本論文將經由看一帶一路戰略的全貌,進一步發掘 16+1 合作

的意涵,分析觀察截至今日的發展進程,以對未來的發展得出心得。

關鍵字

一帶一路 ； 16+1 合作 ； 中國 ； 歐盟 ； 中東歐國家 ； 區域合作

並列摘要

China introduced the concept of OBOR in 2013, since then it’s been a global issue. 16+1 Cooperation is formed in 2011, the CEEs are all both parts of OBOR and 16+1, and China has seized this opportunity to strengthen and deepen its relations with the Central and Eastern European countries. What does China want to achieve through these strategies? The Visegrad Group located in a important strategic position, how would they response to China? Thus, this study would like to analysis the OBOR and the 16+1, then the relations between China and the Visegrad Group. Hopefully, would be able to come out with a result which could help figure the later development of these strategies.

並列關鍵字

OBOR ； 16+1 ； China ； EU ； Regional Cooperation ； Central and Eastern Europe

參考文獻

1. Michael J, Hogan.(1987), The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe , 1947-1952., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. P. Leung., “Chinese investment in Europe – the case of Piraeus Port”, European Union, European Union Academic Programme Hong Kong, 6 May 2015

7. Arduino, “The New Silk Road”, Europe China Research and Advice Network (ECRAN), May 2014

8. “Chinese go on spending spree and double investment in Europe”, Financial Times, 10 February, 2015

9. Meunier, “A Faustian bargain or just a good bargain? Chinese foreign direct investment and politics in Europe”, Asia Europe Journal, 8 March 2014