御注《老子》之詮釋與比較

Emperor's Interpretation Introspection over Lao-Tzu's viewpoints and contrasts

韓秀利(Hsiu-Li Han)

指導教授 ： 袁保新

淡江大學/文學院/中國文學系博士班/博士(2011年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00921

摘要

本文研究目的：以明太祖《御注》為切入點，輔以唐玄宗、宋徽宗為研究對象，從不同時代、不同詮釋風格、不同詮釋體系論述，探究御注《老子》的義理趨向與思想義蘊。盼能說明三位皇帝詮釋差異原由？並展開義理比較與歷史地位之衡定。
本文研究方法：以兩種方法作為研究指引。首先，以西方詮釋學為參照，以御注《老子》為個案，論述過程中，西方詮釋學主要作為發現新問題或產生自覺問題意識的一面鏡子。其次，再參照沈清松先生對比研究法，不對原典作出新解，而是藉此比較詮釋系統間的差異性，提出具有理性和方法自覺的哲學論述。
本文研究成果：本文論述茲分七章進行分析，綜合論述進路。確實解決關於御注《老子》諸多問題，如御注《老子》的義理趨向、御注《老子》詮釋理路省察、御注《老子》思想義蘊分析等。另外關於御注《老子》諸多概念的釐定，如「聖人形象」、「修身論」、「理國論」等，也獲得疏理。通過本文的完成，大體展示對三皇御注思想的體會，並在時代脈絡中呈顯各自的意義，及其思想發展的內在邏輯性。
本文學術貢獻：本文立基在三位皇帝對老學的疏通，探討老學詮釋根源性中解答的問題，在撰述中之立言抒志，追問不同詮釋背後所預設的義理根據，在當代脈絡中找到恰當的理解形式，對中國思想史提供另一種思維方向，並提供領導者之借鏡，具有現代意義。
本文未來展望：玄宗、徽宗、太祖《御注》的詮釋觀點對其他注家的承傳與影響，未能有承繼、突破與開展。擬作未來研究之矢向。

關鍵字

老子 ； 皇帝注老 ； 唐玄宗 ； 宋徽宗 ； 明太祖

並列摘要

Purpose of the article: Based on Ming Emperor Taizu “emperor’s explanation” as a standing point, plus with the research subjects of Tang Emperor Xuanzong and Song Emperor Huizong, attempt to expound, deliberate the textural tendency and thinking meaning of emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu” under the ground of different ages, varied styles of interpretation and distinct explaining systems in hope of outstandingly stating the sakes that lead the differences of explanation from the foresaid three emperors, and therefore stretch out the comparison of their principles and the appraisal of their historic positions.

Method of the study: Utilize two methods as the study direction. First of all, apply western interpretation technology as reference, and implement emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu” as the case to be explored; during the processes of discussion, western interpretation technology is mainly aimed at finding new issues or incurring a mirror that consciously reflects awareness of potential questions. Secondly, cite Mr. Ching-Song Shen’s contrast research pattern, not to present any new explanation to original literature but comparing the differences between systems of explanation to draw up logically philosophic express in which the central idea is rational and initiatively solvable.

Outcome of the study: The article is divided into 7 chapters to analyze, comprehend each expounding path. The mode indeed actually resolves a lot of issues regarding emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu”, for example: textual tendency of emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu”, examination of explanatory context of emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu”, and analysis of thinking principle of emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu”, etc. On the other hand, in terms of formulation to plenty of concepts about emperor’s explanation over “Lao-Tzu”, such as “image of saint”, “theory of practicing moral culture” and “theory of running the country”, etc. have all gained a clear clarification. Through completion of the article, it generally displays the meaningful understanding over the thoughts of these three emperors’ explanation, and the significant purport that each of them perfectly delivers in their own age, as well as the inherent logic embedded in development of the cerebration.

Academic contribution the article presents: The article is composed at the base of the three emperors’ resolution over Lao-Tzu theory to probe into the issues laid under the source of explanation over Lao-Tzu theory seeking for solution, and achieve and relieve by writing in the composition for figuring out the pre-set creed basis behind different line of interpretation in view of getting the most appropriate understanding forms in the contemporary arteries to offer an other kind of thinking orientation to history of Chinese ideologies, and thus grant the leader a chance to learn from that fully appears with modern meaning.

Future anticipation of the article: The descendents and influences brought from empeoror Xuanzong’s, Huizong’s and Taizu’s “opinions and explanation” to the other series of interpretation are disabled from progressive inheritance, breakthrough and development, it is sketched to be the purpose of future research.

並列關鍵字

Lao-Tzu ； Emperor’s Explanation over “Lao-Tzu” ； Tang Emperor Xuanzong ； Song Emperor Huizong ； Ming Tmperor Taizu

參考文獻

高柏園：《中庸形上思想》（台北：東大圖書股份有限公司，1988年3月）。

王邦雄：〈從傳統走向現代的自我轉化之道〉《鵝湖》四三○期（臺北：鵝湖月刊雜誌社，2011年5月）。

袁保新：〈秩序與創新－－從文化治療學的角度省思道家哲學的現代意涵〉，《鵝湖月刊》314期（臺北：鵝湖月刊雜誌社，2001年8月）。

高柏園：〈無為而無不為-道家管理藝術之理論與應用〉《鵝湖月刊》二七九期（臺北：鵝湖月刊雜誌社，1998年10月）。

高柏園：《莊子內七篇思想研究》（台北：文津出版社，2000年5月初版二刷）。