透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.185.147
  • 學位論文

銀行治理機制、經營風險與其價值關聯性之研究

An Empirical Examination of the Relevance between Corporate Governance, Operation Risk, And Market Value

指導教授 : 黃振豊
共同指導教授 : 陳戰勝(Johnson Chen)

摘要


台灣銀行業在經過亞洲金融風暴之後,銀行資產品質下降,逾期放款比率攀升,造成銀行獲利大幅衰退,甚至有金融機構面臨倒閉,引發金融危機。而公司監理機制之不完善,是導致亞洲金融危機的主要原因。文獻中指出,良好的公司治理能降低控制股東侵佔資產的動機。本文藉由銀行治理的評估了解那些治理機制會影響銀行經營風險及其價值。再探討經營風險與銀行價值的關係,研究主要以1999年至2003年台灣上市櫃13家金控公司子銀行及17家獨立銀行為研究對象透過分析,實證結論如下: 1、控制股東現金流量權越高,銀行經營風險越低,符合正的誘因效 果;另外當控制權偏離現金流量權的幅度越大時,控制股東對小 股東剝削的程度愈大,銀行經營風險越高,產生負的侵佔動機。 而導致偏離的主要原因即為運用金字塔結構、交叉持股及收購委 託書等策略,以較少資金投入卻擁有較高的投票權。 2、銀行董事會規模、關係人放款比例與經營風險呈正相關;然而存 在有次大股東則與經營風險呈負相關。 3、銀行存在有次大股東能有效提升市價淨值比。 4、銀行價值與自有資本適足率、調整後淨值呈正相關,而與逾期放 款比率呈負相關。

並列摘要


After passing the Asian financial storm, Taiwan banking has begun to show signs of the quality of banking assets deteriorating and the overdue lending ratio rising. Those signs caused the banking profitability to a great extent decrease, and even some of the financial institutions faced the threat of bankruptcy, and triggered the financial crisis. A not well-being corporate governance mechanism is a primary reason to cause the Asian financial crisis. According to the documentary, good corporate governance can lower the dominating shareholder’s incentive to seize the assets of a company. This text is from bank governance evaluation to understand what kind of governance mechanism affects the bank operation risk and its value. Furthermore, I’d like to discuss the relationship between the bank operation risk and the bank value from the main study during 1999 to 2003, including the thirteen public-listed and OTC-listed financial holding subsidiary banks and seventeen independent banks. The empirical result suggests: 1、The dominating shareholders have the more power in cash  flow control, the lower the bank operation risk, which   is consistent with the positive incentive effect. In    addition, when the dominating shareholders deviated with  the control right in cash flow control, then more     exploitation happens in minority shareholders, banks get  higher risk of operation, and a negative seized      motivation will be created. The major reasons of the    divergence are adapting the strategy such as using     pyramid’s structure, cross shareholding, and purchasing  proxy…etc., which are investing the lower capital but   with owning the higher voting right. 2、The size of board at banks, and the lending ratio of   relative party have direct correlation with the bank    operation risk; However, the banks hold the existing    secondary major shareholders have negative correlation   with the operation risk. 3、The banks hold the existing secondary major        shareholders can effectively promote P/B ratio. 4、The capital adequacy ratio of banks, and adjusted net   worth per share have positive correlation with the bank  value; but the overdue lending ratio has negative     correlation with bank value.

參考文獻


12、黃銘傑(2000),公司監控與監察人制度改革論--超越「獨立董  事」之迷思,台大法學論叢,第二十九卷第四期,159-208.
19、楊敏華(2003),「公司治理之研究」,法令月刊,第54 券第  4 期,頁46-62。
13、俞海琴、劉維琪,「銀行內部人士持股比率與資產風險關係之  研究」,中國財務學會83 年年會論文集,325-334。
22、趙維穎(2004)「董事會屬性、董事會功能與企業經營績效之關  聯性研究」,中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。
5、曾令寧、黃仁德,2003 公司治理原則與健全實務,台灣金融財 務季刊第四輯第四期147-167。

延伸閱讀