本研究旨在建構大學教師研究績效指標及指標相對權重,以期提供教育行政機構、大學院校與大學教師一套客觀的研究績效評量指標,作為各項獎補助的參考依據。 本次研究過程,首先從文獻探討的歸納中,擬出初步的大學教師研究績效指標架構,並採用三次問卷向專家們進行問卷調查。第一、第二次問卷調查採用德爾菲法確認出大學教師研究績效指標及層級,第三次問卷調查採用層級分析法,計算出指標相對權重。經過上述三次問卷調查、資料彙整與統計分析後,提出以下結論及建議: 一、結論: 1.本研究「大學教師研究績效指標」主要架構共有3個層級,第一層級有5項評鑑指標、第二層級有10項評鑑指標、第三層級有22項指評鑑標。 2.第一層級指標中,「論文發表」項目權重高達33.88%,最為重要。 3.第二層級指標中,「期刊論文發表」項目權重高達29.21 %,最為重要。 4.第三層級指標中,「論文收錄於ABI、AHCI、CIS、SCI、SSCI、EI、TSSCI之國際期刊」項目權重高達25.05 %,最為重要。 5.確認本研究部份第三層級指標需再細分第四層級指標細項,可讓指標定義更明確,架構更完整。 二、未來應用建議: 1.教育行政機關可應用本研究建構之指標,作為評定各大學院校研發績效的標準。 2.各大學院校可參考本研究建構之指標及權重,建立評量表,讓大學教師可透過評量表了解自身研究績效成果。 三、後續研究建議: 1.利用本研究建構之指標與權重,進行實例研究。 2.可再運用更多研究方法,強化本研究架構及指標權重值。 3.針對偏向人文、設計等特殊屬性的學門領域,做指標項目的修正、增減與權重的調整。
The purpose of this study was to construct indexes and relative weights for the evaluation of university teacher’s research performance, in hope of providing a set of objective research performance indexes for educational administration, universities, and university teachers, as a reference of academic subsidization. In this research, a preliminary structure of indexes for evaluating university teacher's research performance was drafted, based on the literature review. Later, 3 questionnaire surveys were conducted on experts. In the first and second surveys, Delphi Method was applied to confirm the indexes and hierarchies of university teacher’s research performance. In the third survey, Analytic Hierarchy Process was adopted to calculate the relative weight of each index. Through the above surveys, data collection, and statistic analyses, the following discussions and suggestions were proposed. I.Conclusions: 1.The structure of "University Teacher’s Research Performance Indexes” are in 3 hierarchies. There are 5 evaluation indexes in the first hierarchy, 10 in the second, and 22 in the third. 2.In the first hierarchy, “Thesis Publication” has the highest weight of 33.88% and is the most important item. 3.In the second hierarchy, “Journal Publication” has the highest weight of 29.21% and is the most important item. 4.In the third hierarchy, “Thesis accepted in ABI, AHCI, CIS, SCI, SSCI, EI, and TSSCI international journals” has the highest weight of 25.05% and is the most important item. 5.It has been confirmed that the indexes in the third hierarchy can be subdivided into more detailed indexes of the fourth hierarchy, so as to provide a clearer definition of indexes and a more integral structure. II.Suggestions for Future Applications: 1.Educational administrations may apply the indexes constructed in this study as the criteria for the evaluation of research performance in university. 2.Universities may refer to the indexes and weights constructed in this study to create an evaluation scale so that university teachers can use it to understand their research performance. III.Suggestions for Future Studies: 1.The indexes and weights constructed in this study can be used in case studies. 2.More research methods can be used to strengthen the structure of this research and index weights. 3.For disciplines more related to arts, literature, and design, indexes and weights can be modified and adjusted.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。