透過您的圖書館登入
IP:34.238.138.162
  • 學位論文

應用德爾菲法與層級分析法建構大學教師研究績效指標

The Application of Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process to Construction of University Teacher’s Research Performance Indexes

指導教授 : 邱垂昱

摘要


本研究旨在建構大學教師研究績效指標及指標相對權重,以期提供教育行政機構、大學院校與大學教師一套客觀的研究績效評量指標,作為各項獎補助的參考依據。 本次研究過程,首先從文獻探討的歸納中,擬出初步的大學教師研究績效指標架構,並採用三次問卷向專家們進行問卷調查。第一、第二次問卷調查採用德爾菲法確認出大學教師研究績效指標及層級,第三次問卷調查採用層級分析法,計算出指標相對權重。經過上述三次問卷調查、資料彙整與統計分析後,提出以下結論及建議: 一、結論: 1.本研究「大學教師研究績效指標」主要架構共有3個層級,第一層級有5項評鑑指標、第二層級有10項評鑑指標、第三層級有22項指評鑑標。 2.第一層級指標中,「論文發表」項目權重高達33.88%,最為重要。 3.第二層級指標中,「期刊論文發表」項目權重高達29.21 %,最為重要。 4.第三層級指標中,「論文收錄於ABI、AHCI、CIS、SCI、SSCI、EI、TSSCI之國際期刊」項目權重高達25.05 %,最為重要。 5.確認本研究部份第三層級指標需再細分第四層級指標細項,可讓指標定義更明確,架構更完整。 二、未來應用建議: 1.教育行政機關可應用本研究建構之指標,作為評定各大學院校研發績效的標準。 2.各大學院校可參考本研究建構之指標及權重,建立評量表,讓大學教師可透過評量表了解自身研究績效成果。 三、後續研究建議: 1.利用本研究建構之指標與權重,進行實例研究。 2.可再運用更多研究方法,強化本研究架構及指標權重值。 3.針對偏向人文、設計等特殊屬性的學門領域,做指標項目的修正、增減與權重的調整。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to construct indexes and relative weights for the evaluation of university teacher’s research performance, in hope of providing a set of objective research performance indexes for educational administration, universities, and university teachers, as a reference of academic subsidization. In this research, a preliminary structure of indexes for evaluating university teacher's research performance was drafted, based on the literature review. Later, 3 questionnaire surveys were conducted on experts. In the first and second surveys, Delphi Method was applied to confirm the indexes and hierarchies of university teacher’s research performance. In the third survey, Analytic Hierarchy Process was adopted to calculate the relative weight of each index. Through the above surveys, data collection, and statistic analyses, the following discussions and suggestions were proposed. I.Conclusions: 1.The structure of "University Teacher’s Research Performance Indexes” are in 3 hierarchies. There are 5 evaluation indexes in the first hierarchy, 10 in the second, and 22 in the third. 2.In the first hierarchy, “Thesis Publication” has the highest weight of 33.88% and is the most important item. 3.In the second hierarchy, “Journal Publication” has the highest weight of 29.21% and is the most important item. 4.In the third hierarchy, “Thesis accepted in ABI, AHCI, CIS, SCI, SSCI, EI, and TSSCI international journals” has the highest weight of 25.05% and is the most important item. 5.It has been confirmed that the indexes in the third hierarchy can be subdivided into more detailed indexes of the fourth hierarchy, so as to provide a clearer definition of indexes and a more integral structure. II.Suggestions for Future Applications: 1.Educational administrations may apply the indexes constructed in this study as the criteria for the evaluation of research performance in university. 2.Universities may refer to the indexes and weights constructed in this study to create an evaluation scale so that university teachers can use it to understand their research performance. III.Suggestions for Future Studies: 1.The indexes and weights constructed in this study can be used in case studies. 2.More research methods can be used to strengthen the structure of this research and index weights. 3.For disciplines more related to arts, literature, and design, indexes and weights can be modified and adjusted.

參考文獻


[32] 黃炳煌,「二十一世紀我國高等教育的展望」,彩繪二十一世紀的台灣教育,1990。
[24] 陳淑珍,應用模糊綜合評判於發展網路教師評鑑系統之研究,碩士論文,臺中健康暨管理學院資訊科技研究所,台中,2004
[5] 呂美花,我國技職校院教師教學服務考核指標之建構,碩士論文,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所,台北,2003。
[6] 李惠淑,國民中學教師教學評鑑規準之研究,碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所,台北,2003。
[33] 黃聖凱,大學評鑑指標選取模式之建構-考慮外部競爭環境與模糊群體決策之情況,碩士論文,私立元智大學工業工程研究所,桃園,2000。

被引用紀錄


陳文龍(2014)。高層建築物消防安全設備設置關鍵因素分析〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2014.00213
陳仕昱(2011)。都市水圳再造之規劃準則探討-以瑠公圳大坪林段為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2011.00496
王耀輝(2009)。建築工程基礎開挖工法評選模式之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2009.00214
黃逸書(2014)。家事服務選購之關鍵準則〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201400351
吳振興(2008)。應用德爾菲法與層級分析法建構資訊服務業顧客忠誠之優質服務品質指標〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-2105200820130800

延伸閱讀