良好的學校教室照明應符合學校教室照明各項指標,提供充足的照度、光分佈均勻、無眩光影響與節能等特性。目前國內學校教室燈具為防止眩光而加裝格柵板,然而加裝格柵板雖可使燈具之眩光減少,但同時亦會降低燈具效率;因此本研究冀望設計ㄧ款不需要格柵板的橫向配置燈具。 本研究以Auto CAD2004繪製燈具草圖,再透過光學軟體模擬驗證與檢討,評估橫向配置燈具應用於學校教室照明之可行性。 經過光學軟體模擬驗證,分析數據獲得的結果如下: 1.學校教室照明的耗電量越少越佳,將本研究設計的學校教室橫向配置燈具以9盞配置於虛擬空間中進行模擬,用電密度為9.17 W/m2,比學校教室照明與節能參考手冊規定的教室建議限制的照明用電密度15 W/m2少三分之一,合乎節能標準。 2.本研究設計的學校教室橫向配置燈具採用T5 28W螢光燈2管,燈具效率為89.7%,其佈光方式為直接照明。將燈具以9盞配置於虛擬空間中進行模擬,其數據結果為,作業面平均照度617lx,均齊度0.56,眩光指數範圍介於14-19之間,均符合學校教室照明與節能參考手冊之標準。
Good school lighting appliances should meet some certain criterias such as sufficient lighting, evenly distribution, non-glare effect and most importantly-energy-saving. Nowadays lighting in domestics schools are equipped with louvers to decrease glare. Yet, by doing so, the efficiency of the lighting systems will also be reduced. This study wishes to create a lateral layout lighting without louvers. We draw the draft with Auto CAD2004 and simulate every possible condition on the optical software, trying to estimate the feasibilities of the lateral layout lighting appliances. After analyzing the data, the results are concluded as followed 1. The power consumption of the school lighting appliances should be as low as possible. After we simulate nine lateral layout light in a virtual space, the unit lighting power density comes out as 9.17W/ m2. It is much lower than 15W/m2, the number recommended by the handbook of School Lighting Appliances and Energy-saving issued by ministry of education ,by 1/3. 2. The light we choose in this study are 2 T5 28W fluorescent lamps. The efficiency rate is 89.7%. The illumination of this kind of light is direct lighting. After we simulate nice light in a virtual space, the data we get are as followed (1)Average illuminance is 6171x. (2)Uniformity is 0.56. (3)Unified glare rating is between 14~19. All these data reach the standards in the handbook of School Lighting Appliances and Energy-Saving issued by ministry of education.