大學校園環境應用綠建築之研究－以國立台北科技大學校園為例

A Research on the Applications of Green Building within University Campus－A Case Study of the National Taipei University of Technology

游嘉文(Chia-Wen Yu)

指導教授 ： 宋立垚

國立臺北科技大學/設計學院/建築與都市設計研究所/碩士(2005年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2005.00332

摘要

我國自1999年起開始辦理綠建築之認證，惟屬自願性質，申請案僅5件，但自2002年起強制規定公有建築物必須申請綠建築認證後，綠建築的推動工作，發生了極為巨大轉變，案件數在短短三年內暴增至551件。然而，依賴公部門政策及經費之大量投入，雖然在「量」的提升方面，可看到極大的成長率，但是在「質」的增進上，似看不到同樣的效果。因此，本研究以身為高等教育重鎮的國立大學校園為研究對象，藉由探討大學校園應用綠建築暨其評估指標之執行現況，來瞭解綠建築的具體成效。並透過個案研究，選擇國立台北科技大學校園為實際操作案例，以驗證綠建築各項指標的功用及通過之難易程度。
本研究發現，國立大學校園在綠建築申請方面，不論行政人力、教學資源、政策，以及校地面積上都具優勢，惟並未發揮應有的表現。強制性的規定，無法有效達成預期的目標；反之，自發性的綠建築改造，則具有較好成效。此外，依實證分析結果，17棟調查之建築物中，有七棟可通過四項評估指標。另在各指標中，水資源、污水垃圾改善等二項為極容易通過之指標；生物多樣性、綠化量、保水、室內環境等四項，就大學校園而言，亦屬容易通過之指標，故上述六項指標之成效有限。而CO2減量指標，係突顯採用鋼構造則容易通過，採RC構造則不易通過；至於日常節能指標則為最具成效的一項。最後，本研究建議未來綠建築的修正，應依建築物之屬性分類，而有不同標準，其中大學校園必須成為綠建築推動的典範，並採用較高的規範，以促進未來綠建築的良性發展。

關鍵字

綠建築 ； 大學校園 ； 評估指標

並列摘要

Since 1999, when Green Building Certification was implemented, there had been only 5 applications as it was simply voluntary. However started from 2002, all public architecture is obligated to apply for Green Building Certification, and the promotion of Green Building started to soar. The number of application skyrocketed up to 551 within a short three-year. While depending on the efforts and funds from the public department, the implement has grown greatly in terms of quantity but seemed to stagnate in terms of quality. Thus this research is aimed at national university campuses, which are the frontier of higher education. By studying the application of Green Building on university campuses and evaluating the execution of the assessment indicators, we can shed light on the specific accomplishment of Green Building. In addition, through case study and selecting National Taipei University of Technology as a demonstration of actual operation, we can exam the functions and the admissibility of the various indicators of Green Building.

It was found in this research that when universities apply for Green Building certification, the applicants have advantages in administrative crew, teaching resources, policy, and square measure, which however have not been well exploited. Compulsive regulations do not help reaching the expected goals while spontaneous reformation leads better performance. According to the evidence-based analysis, seven among the seventeen investigated buildings met four of the indicator guidelines. As Water Resource Indicator and Sewage and Garbage Improvement Indicator are the two easiest satisfied ones; Biodiversity Indicator, Greenery Indicator, Soil Water Content Indicator, and Indoor Environment Indicator are also quite accessible for university campuses. The outcomes of the six indicators are limited. CO2 Emission Reduction Indicator suggests that Steel Structures can carry out the task at ease which Reinforced Concrete Structures can barely do; nevertheless, Energy Saving Indicator is the most effective one. Finally, the recommendation for future Green Buildings is that standards should differ as the nature of the buildings varies. University campuses should also set examples for Green Buildings and adopt higher standards to support the future Green Building development.

並列關鍵字

Green Building ； University Campus ； Assessment Indicator

參考文獻

[8] 湯志民，永續發展的校園與建築：學校綠建築規畫之探析，中華民國學校建築研究學會，2003。

[21] 王俊秀，通識教育脈絡下的永續發展教育：共鳴的創作，中華民國90年度環境教育國際學術研討會論文集，國立台灣師範大學分部綜合館，2001/4/20。

[52] 蔣紹良建築師事務所，國立高雄大學法學院大樓新建工程「候選綠建築證書」申請報告書，2002。

[7]黃榮堯、郭瓊瑩，綠營建政策推動策略及藍圖之研究，行政院公共工程委員會研究計畫成果報告，2002.11。

ㄧ、書籍