透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.134.104.173
  • 學位論文

台灣社會與疾病史中的SARS經驗

SARS in Taiwan: The Discussion from the Social and Historical Perspective

指導教授 : 劉士永
共同指導教授 : 張崑將

摘要


本研究之目的為透過當代疾病史研究的理論與史學架構來理解2003年台灣的SARS傳染病事件。然而因為當代台灣社會與其過去間存在著許多衝突,故研究者首先以醫學史家Charles E. Rosenberg的傳染病發展模式(即人們對疫病的普遍性回應)作為全文論述的中心基礎。而在彙整台灣本地的檔案與資料後,研究者回顧日治時期 (1895-1945) 台灣社會回應某些疫病(如鼠疫及西班牙流感)的重要經驗,並提出台灣社會回應疫病經驗的共通點,以適度地重塑Rosenberg的理論,使之符合2003年台灣SARS傳染病事件的發展。 一般而言,台灣的SARS傳染病事件不只傷害了台灣人民對現代醫療的信心,也如一面明鏡般,照映出台灣社會深埋已久的陰暗角落。因而我們可以說,即使現代醫療的全球化已是不可避免的趨勢,但2003年的台灣SARS傳染病事件仍不自覺地顯現出許多來自過去台灣經驗的特性。在SARS流行期間,當社會的恐慌情緒已一發不可收拾之際,日治時期的衛生警察系統與惡名昭彰的「避病院」等舊時回憶也於此刻重現,並且影響了現代政府因應SARS的緊急政策與社會回應。同時,正如1945年以前殖民政府的作法,現代的台灣政府也努力想藉由掌握官方新聞與通報的統計數字來達到操控疫情的效果,但有時卻因忽略了來自群眾謠言與媒體(包括網際網路)的強大影響力,以致於意圖操控疫情的諸般努力,反而造成新的困境。 在諸多與SARS相關之論述中,本研究乃首度以歷史及社會的觀點深究2003年台灣的SARS傳染病事件;基於此,研究者將群體與個體面臨SARS時的感受一併探論做為此一事件的記憶,並將這本論文獻給所有曾經親歷其境的人們。

並列摘要


This study aims to understand SARS incident in 2003 Taiwan by the theoretical and historical framework from current studies of the history of epidemics. Being aware of the ubiquitous interference in contemporary Taiwanese society and from its past, the author first adapts the general pattern that human beings respond to epidemics, by medical historian Charles E. Rosenberg as the essential foundation to the whole discussion. Compiling local archives and data, the author reviews key experiences that Taiwanese society dealt with several epidemics such as plague and Spanish flu during the Japan-ruled period (1895-1945). In the end, the author can finally portray the common ground of Taiwanese experience of fighting sever epidemics to moderately re-shape Rosenberg’s theory matching the development of SARS incident in 2003 Taiwan. Generally speaking, the SARS incident in Taiwan was not merely an epidemic hurting the Taiwanese’s confidence to modern medical care, but also a mirror reflecting the shadow corner that had been long term buried in Taiwanese society. In conclusion, despite the globalization of modern medicine is inevitable, the 2003 SARS incident in Taiwan reveals many unexpected features from local experience. As the panic was overwhelming during the incident, old memory to the system of sanitary policeman, notorious isolation ward in Japan-ruled period came back and guided current emergency policies of SARS as well as the social response. Meanwhile, the state struggled to stay in control by holding the official press and announcing statistical numbers as the old colonial government did before 1945. However, such struggles sometimes showed a dead end when current government neglected the powerful impact from mass rumor and media including internet.Among all the discussions of SARS in 2003 Taiwan, this study is certainly not the last but could be the one sharing historical/social insights to the discussion. On that stand, the collective and individual feelings about SARS incident are equally treated by the author to leave information to remember and dedicate those who had been there.

參考文獻


27. 劉翠溶、劉士永,〈台灣歷史上的疾病與死亡〉,《台灣史研究》4:2(1999),頁89-132。
2. SARS之定義與簡介(疾病管制局)-
6. 吳嘉苓、曾嬿芬,〈SARS的風險治理:超越技術模型〉,《社會學研究》11(2006),頁57-109。
38. 〈和平醫護「癒後」 創痛未弭〉,《聯合報》,2003年6月9日,A7版。
14. 〈叫我們抗煞英雄,太沈重!〉,《民生報》,2003年6月19日,A15版。

被引用紀錄


吳安琪(2011)。解析傳染病的社會建構:以新流感H1N1為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00877
鄭偉柏(2014)。影片作品《B棟8樓》創作論述〔碩士論文,國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6835/TNUA.2014.00016
黃志傑(2013)。兩岸疾病預防控制體系之比較探討-以SARS疫災前後之變革為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00207

延伸閱讀