本論文研究係針對燃料電池運用於軍事通訊設備供電系統可行性進行評估,茲將各項結論條列如下: (1)通訊基地台之最高用電量為4120w,用電範圍3000w~4500w之間,而中繼站台之最高用電量為1059w,用電範圍1000w~1100w之間。因此,如以燃料電池做為通訊基地台之主供電系統或輔助供電系統,需使用5kw燃料電池;而中繼站台則使用2kw之燃料電池即足夠。 (2)實際投資成本鉛酸電池每KW為:10002.52 $NTD/小時;而燃料電池每KW為:204003.15 $NTD,以成本為出發點考量鉛酸電池適合於短時間(21小時內)電力備援,而21小時以上之電力備援則燃料電池最符合經濟效益。 (3)以六年為期的燃料電池生命週期設計值估算,燃料電池取代鉛酸電池為固定式通訊設備之備援電力經濟效益比較,六年共可節省總投資費用:1277250000$NTD。 (4)軍事通訊設備之主電力及備源電力均以燃料電池供電,則推估每年可減少CO2總排放量為660946.23 Kg- CO2。
The research of this thesis is aimed to conduct assessment of the feasibility research on fuel cells used in power supply system of military communication Equipment. The findings have been listed as follows: (1)The maximum power consumption of a communication base station is 4120 w, power consumption ranging between 3000w~4500w.The maximum power consumption of a relay station is 1059 w, power consumption ranging between 1000w~1100w.Fuel cells hence used as a main power supply system or auxiliary power supply system of a communication station require 5kw; and 2Kw fuel cells would be sufficiently used for a delay station. (2)Actual investment cost of lead acid battery per Kw would be 10002.52 NT dollars / hour; fuel cell per Kw would be: 204003.15 $ NT dollars. Considering the cost, lead acid battery is suitably used for short period of time (within 21 hours) as power backup. For More than 21 hours of power backup, fuel cells may be most economical. (3)Based on six years of a life cycle of a fuel cell, instead of the lead acid battery, full cells for the back-up power of fixed communication equipment are assessed in comparison for economic benefits. The total investment cost with fuel cells will save 1277250000$ NTD for a period of six years. (4)Main power and back power backup of the military communication equipment are supplied by fuel cells, and a total exhaust volume of 773799.48 Kgs- CO2 can be reduced.