透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.48.135
  • 學位論文

線上音樂產業著作權授權制度變遷之研究

A STUDY ON COPYRIGHT AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM CHANGE OF ONLINE MUSIC INDUSTRY

指導教授 : 左正東
共同指導教授 : 江耀國
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以利益團體理論,以及集體行動理論與歷史制度主義對利益團體理論的反思為理論背景,探討近年來線上音樂產業發展中所衍生的著作權議題,並分析權利人與利用人透過遊說途徑,爭取行政部門與立法部門支持的過程。 在研究方法上,本研究透過次級資料分析及深度訪談法進行,結果發現2005年的司法判決是可以說是產業發展的分水嶺。在此之前,Kuro與ezPeer兩家P2P業者面臨司法訴訟時,曾透過草擬法案、組成聯盟等管道爭取支持,但皆未能達成目標。在2005年雙方走向和解與合作後,線上音樂業者仍受到唱片業界內部分配比率、版權制度混亂等情況影響,營運上深受司法訴訟的壓力。 但是,受限於經營環境與目前著作權政策領域所能處理的問題限制,線上音樂業者間即使具有共識,但仍無法如集體行動理論所稱,形成創造『公共財』,解決業界問題的誘因。而在利用人缺乏參與,未能將相關議題導入決策過程的情況下,整理著作權法制的變遷也正如歷史制度主義所稱,呈現延續既有路徑的自我強化,在逐步保障權利人權益之餘,未能進一步考量授權市場現況,合理保障利用人權益。

並列摘要


The purpose of this research was to apply interest group theory and considering from the concepts of collective action theory and historical institutionalism, to discuss the copyright authority issue relating to online music industry, and to analyze lobbying strategies that copyright holders and users employed to influence the administrative and legislative department. Secondary data analysis and in-depth interview were the main research methods. This research found that the court verdict in 2005 was a division in process of the industrial environment changing. Before 2005, the P2P providers, such as Kuro and ezPeer, had employed a variety of lobbying strategies to gain the support, but couldn't achieve the goal. After 2005, although recording industry and online music industry had started their cooperation, online music industry still suffered from the pressure of copyright infringement because of the internal sharing ratio among recording industry and chaotic registration institution of music copyright. But, due to the constrain of industrial environment and the limitation of issues that the copyright policy network could deal with, even though there is common view among the online music industry, they are still in the absence of incentives to provide "public goods" which as collective action theory claims. Thus, the online music industry hadn't participated in the copyright policy network positively. As a result, the idea of path dependency provides a reasonable explanation for the path of copyright law system.

參考文獻


呂雪彗,2008/01/16。<著作權仲介團體條例修正草案 政院退回經濟部再研議>,《工商時報》
經濟部智慧財產局,2008/03。著作權仲介團體條例修正草案(行政院核定版),
< http://www.tipo.gov.tw/copyright/著作權仲介團體條例修正草案(行政院核定版).doc>
經濟部智慧財產局著作權審議及調解委員會95年第6次會議紀錄,
楊泰順,2005/01。< 人權與立法:以著作權法的立法過程為例>,《 台灣民主季刊》,第二卷,第一期,頁75-121

被引用紀錄


林依璇(2012)。從日本對TPP之因應探討著作權法制定過程之正當性〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10029

延伸閱讀