透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.12.240
  • 學位論文

Co-opetition Dynamics: Antecedents and Its Impacts on Service Innovation

Co-opetition Dynamics: Antecedents and Its Impacts on Service Innovation

指導教授 : 陳家祥
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究主要針對台灣旅行社躉售的關係,探討其中競合動態對於服務創新的影響。透過服務主導邏輯、服務創新、資源基礎理論、競合等文獻回顧,本研究歸納競合動態的前置因素,並推導出數個研究假設,瞭解其對服務創新之影響,進而對創新及公司績效影響,並從中探討創新績效的中介角色;以從業人員心態做為競合動態及服務創新之調節變數。 透過問卷的發放及回收,本研究從綜合旅行社及甲種旅行社的角度探討競合動態的研究及其對服務創新之影響,並使用Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS)及Partial Least Squares (PLS)分析其研究結果。結果顯示,競合動態對服務創新、創新績效及公司績效皆有正面的影響,且創新績效具有其中介效果。競爭強度及互補性皆為競合動態之前因,並於本文中提出與競爭者形成合作關係,維持及平衡其關係,將有助於服務創新。本研究對旅遊業的研究貢獻,主要在於選擇良好的競爭夥伴,透過彼此間互補的能力及資源,將有助於公司績效的提升。

並列摘要


According to our study, the wholesale of travel agency in Taiwan will be our target. This research focus on co-opetition dynamics had a positive effect on service innovation, and influence on innovation performance and firm performance also. We proposed several antecedents as our variables and based on service-dominant logic (SDL), service innovation, resource based view, co-opetition theory and we came up with several hypotheses. According to questionnaire we distributed, the result showed that co-opetition dynamics had a positive effect on service innovation, innovation performance and firm performance. Innovation performance played a mediating role between service innovation and firm performance. There are two antecedents should be considered including competitive intensity and complementarities, affecting the formation and evolution of co-opetition relationship. In the end of this study, we will provide some contributions and implications that will be delivered to this industry.

參考文獻


1. Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., Moberg, D. P., & Christiansen, A. (2004). Understanding Adolescent Intentions to Smoke: An Examination of Relationships Among Social Influence, Prior Trial Behavior, and Antitobacco Campaign Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 110-123.
2. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of marketing research, 396-402.
3. Arya, B., & Lin, Z. (2007). Understanding Collaboration Outcomes From an Extended Resource-Based View Perspective: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics, Partner Attributes, and Network Structures†. Journal of management, 33(5), 697-723.
4. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54-74.
5. Avlonitis, G., Papastathopoulou, P., & Gounaris, S. (2001). An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5), 324-342.