本研究試圖從階級的觀點切入,瞭解國家認同是如何在個人的社會化過程中被建構,行動者是如何在日常生活中展演自身的國家認同概念,以及行動者是如何對於國家進行認同。 筆者援引 Jenkins(2000, 2006)的社會認同理論,將社會共同體的認同區分為分類的類屬(categories)與認同行動(identification)兩部分,並由類屬與認同行動的互動,探討臺灣國家認同建構的過程。因為探討的是認同的過程,所以透過質性方法較可以蒐集到筆者所需的資料,另因為國家認同不是在日常生活隨時會展演的。所以筆者採用了訪談法作為研究的方法。 訪談結果呈現臺灣民族主義一再強調土地文化與國家認同的連結,其實並不是本質性的觀點,而是反映了當代黨國體制以及現代資本主義的脈絡之下,核心與邊陲的不平等社會結構。在此族群的意義並不在於血緣與文化,而是代表處於邊陲的行動者對於自身結構位置的認知與策略行動。
The study aims to understand the construction of national identity via the perspective of class. It is particularly interested in understanding how individuals perform the ideas of nation in daily life, and the ways in which they identify themselves with nation. The research adopts Jenkin’s theory of social identity to differentiate identity categories from identification. By interviewing people of different walks on how they perceive the identity categories of nation and how they understand themselves in relation to such perceptions, it seeks to explore the role of class in the construction of Taiwanese nationa identity. It finds at the end that much as Taiwanese national identity hinges on primordial ideas of land and culture, it in fact reflects the unequal relations between the core and the periphery under first of all the party-state and later the contemporary capitalist world system. In it is embodied not only a self-perception of structural position, but also possibilities for strategic action.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。