透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.165.66
  • 學位論文

鳳山打鐵街—一個消失中的台灣產業工藝聚落

Fongshan Datie (Blacksmith) Street - A Disappearing Community of Artifacts in Taiwan Industry

指導教授 : 陳其南
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


在「鳳山打鐵街」成為公部門推動城市觀光的其中一個景點下,進而引發筆者進一步思考鳳山打鐵街得以發展成為觀光景點的條件,並且從新(心)解讀鳳山打鐵街。本篇文章透過文獻資料的收集以及田野訪談的實踐,以形塑鳳山打鐵街的想像與地方知識;另一方面,在資料的整理與分析中,進而運用柳宗悅所提出之「民藝美學」的論述,以此作為看待物與人之間互動關係的另一種思維模式。藉由對於物、人之間互動關係的建立,期許能夠進而掌握鳳山打鐵街所蘊存的文化內涵,展現其地方知識,並將此帶入文化產業發展可能性的思考當中。 在審美的實踐過程中,打鐵街之於筆者不再只是一個夕陽工業的象徵,論文題目中的「消失」意味的不只是一個狀態,其所蘊含的地方記憶技藝與美感,更在這個狀態下脫穎而出。儘管於論文中的解釋多為主觀,但卻也開啟了屬於筆者的審美實踐。

並列摘要


As a consequence of Fongshan Datie (Blacksmith) Street’s becoming one of the tourist spots designated under the promotional scheme of the public sector in Taiwan, the author of this research was inspired to further contemplate on the circumstances under which Fongshan Datie Street could develop into a scenic spot, and thus redefine its meaning and stance. On one hand, this research paper attempted to outline the imagination and local knowledge of the street through the collection of literature and the realization of field studies. On the other hand, by means of compilation and analyzing the data, the author made use of the so-called “folk-art aesthetics” proposed by Liu zong-yue (柳宗悅) as an alternative way of viewing human-object interaction. With the establishment of human-object interaction, the author expected to grasp the implicit cultural connotations within the street, express its local knowledge, and envisage the possibility of bringing it into cultural industry. In the process of art appreciation, Datie Street was no longer a symbol of a declining sunset industry to the author. The word “disappearing” in the title implies more than a status. Its implicit local memories, art crafts and aesthetics also stand out under such a standing. Despite that the explanations within this research are to some degree subjective, they still demonstrate the appreciation of art exclusive to the author.

參考文獻


臺灣銀行 經濟研究室
財團法人成大研究發展基金會
1991 〈臺灣工藝的發展與變遷(上)〉《臺灣美術》4:2 = 14。
1992b 〈臺灣工藝的發展與變遷(下)〉《臺灣美術》4:4 = 16。
  2006 〈柳宗悅與台灣民藝〉《文資學報》2。

延伸閱讀