透過您的圖書館登入
IP:54.81.33.119
  • 學位論文

亞洲城市競爭力之績效評估

Evaluating the performance of Urban Competitiveness in Asia

指導教授 : 丁崇德
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


面對全球經濟型態的改變,提昇與發展一國之競爭力,已由國家政府轉移至地方政府。城市代表著一個國家或地區的政治、經濟和文化中心,並且匯聚了人才、資本、技術及思想的商務活動,使得城市逐漸成為國家經濟發展的主體。因此,要探究國家在世界市場中的競爭力強弱,實應從探究國家內部之主要城市是否具有競爭優勢開始。基於城市競爭力日趨重要,及近年來亞洲地區快速成長,本研究試圖評估亞洲地區城市間競爭力關係,並參考相關文獻建構綜合性競爭力指標,以確切反映城市競爭表現。 在研究方法上,過去實證文獻多採用專家問卷,並以層級分析法來衡量指標,然對於指標權重較為主觀且不精確。由於資料包絡法(Data Envelopment Analysis ; DEA)不但能處理不同單位的多投入及多產出,且相當適合處理相對效率之研究。 綜此,本研究以《全球城市競爭力報告2005~2006》中前100名之亞洲城市,包括東京、香港、杜拜、首爾、新加坡、台北、橫濱、大阪、川崎、名古屋、上海、北京、深圳、廣州、札幌、高雄、仙台、澳門、杭州、京都、大連、蘇州、廈門、青島、天津、成都、釜山、南京、珠海、溫州等30個城市,運用DEA衡量各城市之績效值。透過SPSS統計軟體進行相關係數分析,選取投入項與產出項皆為顯著正相關之變數。並經由DEAP軟體分析結果,顯示東京、杜拜、京都不論在CCR、BCC模式皆屬強勢效率單位之城市。另外,台北其整體技術效率值為0.557、純粹技術效率值為0.854,高雄其整體技術效率值為0.625、純粹技術效率值為0.967,就CCR、BCC模式而言,此兩城市未具有良好之績效表現,相較於其他亞洲城市,台灣城市競爭力仍有提昇的空間。

並列摘要


Facing the change of global economic mode, the advancing and developing a national competitiveness is already transfered national government to the local government. A city represents the political, economy, cultural center of a nation or region, and it assembles human resource, capital, technology, and thinking of business activity to make itself develop the main of national economic development gradually. Therefore, we would study how the national competitiveness is strong or weak in the world market and first we would study whether the main city in the country have competitive advantage or not. Because of the urban competitiveness is more and more important, and the Asia’s region grows up quickly in recent years, we attempt to evaluate the relation of the main urban competitiveness about 30 cities in Asia and to improve the competitiveness condition of those cities using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) . Because DEA could not only handle with different input and output units, but also handle quite suitably with a research of the relative space’s efficiency. In conclusion, the research would measure the performance value of each city which are the first 100 cities in Asia of 《Global Urban competitiveness report 2005~2006》,Tokyo, Hong Kong, Dubai, head, Singapore, Taipei, Yokohama, Osaka, Sichuan is rugged, Nagoya, Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Sapporo, Kaohsiung, Sendai, Macao, Hangzhou, Kyoto, Dalian, Suzhou, Xiamen, Qingdao, Tianjin, Chengdu, Busan, Nanjing, Zhuhai, Wenzhou by DEA. The results indicated that for Tokyo, Dubai, Kyoto seem to achieve its competitiveness in the efficient frontier by DEA. Besides, as far as the whole technology and absolute technological efficiency are concerned, Taipei didn't have a good performance, and it is the distinctly inefficient units that it compare with other cities in Asia. Consequently, the Taiwan cities would still make more effort.

參考文獻


3. 林祖嘉、陳建良(2001)。大陸各省市總體競爭力分析,台灣金融財務季刊,2(3),1-15。
1. Aigner, D. J. & Chu, S. F., (1968). On Estimating the Industry Production Function, American Economic Review, 58, 826-829.
15. 陳冠位(2002)。城市競爭優勢評量系統之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所博士論文,台南市。
5. 林震岩(2000)。大陸地區投資環境與風險調查,台灣區電機電子工業同業公會委託研究計畫。
2. Andersen, P. & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking Efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264.

延伸閱讀