不同高爾夫球鞋鞋釘對木桿開球時前足穩定性之影響

The Different Golf Soft Spikes Which Can Influence The Front Foot Stability When Swing by The Driver-Wood

楊庭禎(Ting-Chen Yang)

指導教授 ： 劉于詮

長榮大學/管理學院/運動休閒管理學系(所)/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00039

摘要

本研究主要針對不同鞋釘款式和鞋釘裝設方向對於使用木桿開球前足穩定性之影響進行研究。實驗招募6位男性高爾夫球運動參與者以其慣用之1號木桿於室內進行揮桿開球，開球時均穿著同款球鞋（MIZUNO 45KM-02962高爾夫球鞋）；但分別裝設不同款式鞋釘（4款圓型鞋釘）或者改變鞋釘裝設方向（以IG3鞋釘做4種方向配置）。研究使用VICON動作分析系統（6部M2攝影機，取樣頻率250Hz；1塊AMTI測力板，取樣頻率1000Hz）和Mathcad 14.0數學計算軟體。統計則以 SPSS軟體進行重複量數單因子變異數分析，顯著水準定為α=.05。結果顯示：一、不同鞋釘款式會影響啟動時踝關節角度，進而對最大與最小踝關節角度產生影響；但改變鞋釘裝設方向並不會影響踝關節角度。於揮桿上桿階段，鞋釘1（六爪釘A- CHAMP品牌STINGER款）與鞋釘3（八爪釘A- SOFTSPIKES PULSAR款）較能夠維持踝關節穩定；反之，在下桿階段鞋釘1與鞋釘3則較”不”能維持踝關節穩定。二、不同鞋釘款式和改變鞋釘裝設方向不會影響揮桿開球對地作用力曲線和足底壓力中心曲線穩定性；但兩者對於揮桿開球人體作用於地面的力矩曲線穩定性會產生影響，在不同鞋釘款式中以鞋釘4（八爪釘B- GOLF WORLD品牌）力矩曲線較穩定；改變鞋釘裝設方向時以方向3（內側鞋釘-12點鐘方向；外側鞋釘-4點鐘方向）和方向4（內側鞋釘-8點鐘方向；外側鞋釘-4點鐘方向）力矩曲線較穩定。三、不同鞋釘款式對揮桿開球左右方向摩擦係數曲線第一、二峰值造成影響，以鞋釘3和鞋釘4摩擦係數較大，穩定性較佳；改變鞋釘裝設方向對於揮桿開球前後方向第二峰值摩擦係數造成影響，以方向1（內側鞋釘-12點鐘方向；外側鞋釘-12點鐘方向）和方向4摩擦係數較大，穩定性較佳。

關鍵字

鞋釘 ； 前足 ； 穩定性

並列摘要

In this research, the effects caused by different kinds and installing directions of spikes on front foot stability when swing by driver-wood were studied. Six male golf players were recruited to swing at indoor using their preferred driver-wood and wearing the same shoes (MIZUNO 45KM-02962) with different kinds (four round spike types) or installing directions of spikes (IG3 spike set toward four directions). VICON motion analysis system (six M2 cameras, sampling rate: 250 Hz; one AMTI force plate, sampling rate: 1000 Hz) and Mathcad 14.0 math software were used when studying. Statistics were completed by one-way repeated measure ANOVA using SPSS software. Significant level was set at α=.05. Results showed: 1. Different kinds of spikes would influence the ankle angle when swing beginning and then affect the maximum and minimum ankle angle during the whole swing. On the contrary, changing the installing directions of spikes wouldn’t affect the ankle angle. During upswing phase, spike 1 (six claws, A- CHAMP-STINGER) and spike 3 (eight claws, A-SOFTSPIKES-PULSAR) would keep the stability of ankle joint more. Reversely, these two spikes wouldn’t keep the stability more during downswing. 2. Different kinds of spikes and changing the installing directions of spikes wouldn’t influence the curve stability including the curve of the force acting to the ground and the curve of foot pressure center in the whole swing. But these two factors would influence the stability of torque curve which was produced by the whole body forcing to the ground during the swing. In the different kinds of spikes, the torque curve of spike 4 (eight claws, B- GOLF WORLD) was more stable. If changing the installing directions of spikes, the torque curves when the spikes installed to the direction 3 (inner spikes were set toward 12 o’clock, outer spikes were set toward 4 o’clock) and direction 4 (inner spikes were set toward 8 o’clock, outer spikes were set toward 4 o’clock) were more stable. 3. Different kinds of spikes would affect the 1st and 2nd peak value of friction coefficient curve in the left/right direction of swing. The better stability performances of shoes with spike 3 and spike 4 were due to the bigger friction coefficients of these two spikes. Changing the installing direction would affect the 2nd peak value of friction coefficient curve in the back/forward direction of swing. The friction coefficients of shoes when the spikes installed to the direction 1 (inner spikes were set toward 12 o’clock, outer spikes were set toward 12 o’clock) and direction 4 were bigger. So these shoes stability were better.

並列關鍵字

golf spike ； the front foot ； stability

參考文獻

行政院體育委員會（1999）。體育法規彙編。台北市：行政院體育委員會。

張添凱（2005）。多功能動作分析軟體系統之開發。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣大學，台北市。

賴永成、賴姍姍、王克武（2012）。使用不同重量的高爾夫球桿後對桿頭速度的立即性影響。嶺東體育暨休閒學刊，10，29 -35。

劉玉仁、邱宏達（2006）。不同站姿於高爾夫揮桿過程之地面反作用力探討。成大體育，39（4），18-29。

高從耀、陳仲立、王順正、王國樑（2011）。高爾夫揮桿動作的軀幹旋轉研究與應用。大專高爾夫學刊，8，55-65。