縣市合併對都市發展邊緣化之影響研究 —以臺南市曾文溪以北地區為例

Marginalization and Strategy of Urban Development after Consolidation of Tainan City and Country：A Case Study of the North Tsengwen River Area

陸美祈(Mei-Chi Lu)

指導教授 ： 周士雄

長榮大學/管理學院/土地管理與開發學系(所)/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00183

摘要

臺南縣市合併改制後，城市在差異融合中邁進。原台南市是台灣古都，面積雖然只佔全市之8.73％，人口卻佔全市之70.34％；然在合併當時，相關配套法令並未一次到位，例如財政收支劃分法與公債法（已於2013年6月27日通過）遲未修正，市府財政未能有效改善下，相對的也無法於境內大力推動各項產業與公共建設。因此在合併過程中，溪北地區民眾對於邊緣化的危機感勝於升格的喜悅，邊緣化之效應將間接影響都市面臨衰退、沒落甚至人口外流，因此公部門在面臨合併之初，必須對於都會區域治理、人民期待的落差、城鄉差距的擴大與未來發展定位等問題，提出具體因應措施。本論文擬探究相對停滯發展以及無競爭力背後所發生之包括政策面、經濟面、社會面等原因是否為造成溪北地區邊緣化之主要原因，透過訪談與實際之地區發展數據來比較探討，以瞭解邊緣化是否真實發生抑或是地方認知上之差異（意即對地方人口、產業或未來發展之一種期待）。最後從強化邊緣地區發展之策略，作為與核心都市互補或營造共存關係之思考方向，研提溪北地區之整體發展策略與成長中心行動方案。

關鍵字

縣市合併 ； 邊緣化 ； 都會治理

並列摘要

After the amalgamation of Tainan County, the city stride forward in diversity integration. The original Tainan city is the ancient city, although the area only occupied 8.73％ of the county,but the population was in possession of 70.34％. However, the necessary policies did not fall into place simultaneously during the consolidation. For example, because “The Law of Subdivision of Financial Income and Expenditure” and “The Public Debt Act”(were approved in June 27th 2013) didn’t correct, the finance cannot improve with effect, government cannot set variety of industries and public infrastructures into action relatively. Because the finance cannot improve with effect, so government cannot set variety of industries and public infrastructures into action relatively. the public of the North Tsengwen River Area feel sense of crisis for marginalization overtake the joy of elevation of status. The effect of marginalization will indirectly affect city recession, downfallen even outward migration. For this reason, the public government must bring up specific measures to cope with metropolitan governance, the drop of public expect, extension of rural-urban disparity and position of future development and so on. The research intends to work out through a mode from downward to forge head analyses stagnation and whether an aspect of politics, finance, society behind uncompetitive were the main reason caused marginalization ofhe North Tsengwen River Area. through interviews of specialist to examine if marginalization was response of real statistics or difference of regional cognition ( means expectation toward local population, industry or future development.) Finally, bring up mode of urban and rural and advices to distinguish core of Tainan city, to strengthen the complementarity and coexistence of border district and core city, and then make a sustainable development space develop way.

並列關鍵字

Consolidation of City and Country ； Marginalization ； Metropolitan Governance

參考文獻

16. 林苡錚(2011)，流域治理合作模式之研究－以臺北市與新北市共管淡水河為例中興大學國家政策與公共事務研究所碩士論文。

37. 鍾偉政(2008)，從區域治理探討中部科學工業園區的開發，國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系碩士論文。

17. 林錫銓(2005)，疆界之隱現─跨界永續治理之體制演化研究，臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文。

王俊元(2011)，如何避免五都以外縣市被邊緣化之策略，國政評論，國家政策研究基金會，1月6日。

李長晏(2012)，區域發展與五都治理：實證調查之分析，中國地方自治，第65卷第11期，頁25-46。