美國專利制度的發展已有數十年的歷史,專利制度為美國帶來技術優勢與累積龐大財富,讓美國在全球市場擁有強大的競爭力。只是體制系統總存在一些待解的問題與爭議,美國專利法的改革案件已開展多年,修法卻遲遲無法通過,其中關於損害賠償的議題在美國司法訴訟與立法各界已爭論多時,晚近司法實務在專利訴訟案,絕大多數採用合理權利金來計算專利侵害之賠償數額,但有些案件卻誤用整體市場價值法則,導致失控的損害賠償數額判決層出不窮,所以美國各界引頸期盼在最近修法能通過調和整體市場價值法則在專利訴訟案中之適用,讓走入偏鋒的不合理訴訟案件回歸常態。 台灣高科技業經常扮演代工的角色,極具零組件加工的經營優勢,相對的,此類型態的企業一旦在美涉及專利侵權訴訟,因為訴訟不確定性高常須負擔相當高的財務風險,影響企業正規經營相當大。因此,本研究特別研究美國專利制度未來之發展走向,以及修法進度,以為台灣科技業在美發展版圖之參考。
The United States patent system has produced extraordinary technological advance in this country over decades. It is the source of enormous wealth. It is the source of enormous power in the global marketplace. But like every system, it has weak points and controversies to be solved. And those are of great concern nowadays. The damages issues have discussed and debated across the practitioners in these patent fields in the United States. For recent years, the reasonable royalties have become the most frequent measure of damages awarded in patent cases overtaking lost profits, and the legislation may inject some balance into the entire market-value rule, cutting back on the recent expansion of the rule. A consistently over-broad application of the entire market-value rule might threaten to chill innovation for those seeking to design, manufacture and sell products, or invest in such endeavors. And some report clearly showed that the damages law was out of control because the courts, were misapplying the law . For Taiwan high-tech companies, in the majority, are in the business to manufacture, sell or offer to sell the products involved the sub-systems, components. While they get the lawsuit of the patent cases in the United States, the highly uncertainty of the patent litigation would be occurred and the monetary risk will be explored at a high stake to threaten their regular business. It is important to figure out the future development of the damage law in the United States, especially, how the courts apply the entire market value rule in the patent cases.