透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.247.196
  • 學位論文

會計師篩選客戶與和解策略之分析

Strategic Interaction Between Screening Clients and Settlement

指導教授 : 戚務君 簡俱揚
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以分性模式探討會計師如何利用客戶篩選與法律政策來管理訴訟風險。本文的研究重心為:(i) 在和解機制下,會計師的最適和解策略;(ii) 在和解機制下,會計師的最適篩選客戶策略;(iii)和解機制對於會計師法律成本的影響。   本文發現,在允許和解的情況下,會計師存在一個最適和解策略,即會計師可以提供一個和解金額等於投資人採取訴訟策略的期望報酬,該金額低於會計師採取非和解策略之期望成本。   另外,在其他條件不變,和解機制成立的條件下,當無風險客戶的先天比重提高、高篩選作業的增額訊號品質下降、客戶發生「劣情境」機率降低、會計師面臨訴訟的勝訴機率上升、裁定為會計師敗訴之損害賠償金額減少、投資人訴訟成本變大或者審計公費提高,會計師會傾向選擇低篩選作業。反之,會計師會選擇高篩選作業。   最後,本文分析和解機制對於會計師法律成本的影響。本文的結論為,無論會計師的篩選投資水準多寡,當會計師面臨訴訟時,在單期的賽局分析下,非和解策略為一個被和解策略凌駕的策略。會計師選擇和解策略的期望成本小於非和解策略的期望成本,因此要求成本極小化的會計師一定發生採取和解策略的均衡。

並列摘要


This study uses analytical method to study how CPA firms use screening clients and litigation policy to manage their litigation risk. Three objectives of this study are to analyze: (i)under the legal environment with settlement, which is the optimum settlement strategy of auditor; (ii)under the legal environment with settlement, which is the optimum screening strategy of auditor; (iii)the effects of allowing settlement on the auditor legal cost. Results indicate that, CPA firms have an optimum settlement strategy on the basis of permitting settlement. That is auditor can offer a settlement amount equal to the expected litigation payoff of investor. Additional, the results indicate that, when other conditions holding constant, the auditor’s optimal screening investment decreases as the prior probability of non-risky client increases, the incremental signal quality of high screening investment decreases, the probability of a bad outcome decreases, the probability of winning the suit increases, the damage award decreases, the legal costs of investor increases and the audit fee increases. On the other hand, auditor’s optimal screening investment will increase. Finally, this study shows that regardless of the level of investment in client screening, when CPA firms against a lawsuit, CPA firms will always choose settlement in a single-period model.

參考文獻


俞洪昭、戚務君與李承易,2000,我國會計師受懲戒原因與種類之關聯性分析,風險管理學報,第二卷第二期: 37-56。
林嬋娟與劉嘉雯,1995,我國與先進國家會計師懲戒制度之比較,中華民國會計師公會全國聯合會研究計畫報告。
劉嘉雯,2003,會計師事務所合併對客戶股價影響之研究−代理假說與保險假說,會計評論,第36期: 1-22。
Baber, William R;Kumar, Krishna R;Verghese, Thomas. 1995. Client security price reactions to the Laventhol and Horwath bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research 33(2): 385-395.
Balachandran, B. V., and N. J. Nagarajan. 1987. Imperfect information, insurance, and auditors’ legal liability. Contemporary Accounting Research 3 (Spring): 281-301.

延伸閱讀