透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.237.46.120
  • 學位論文

防制纏擾行為之立法建議─以校園內不當追求行為為中心

Legislative Proposals For Prevention Stalking─Focus on the Improper Pursuit Behavior of Campus

指導教授 : 張天一
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


追求行為在一般人眼中,或許會視為是一種浪漫的表現,但近來社會上因不當追求行為而產生的纏擾行為及其所衍生之暴力事件等層出不窮,追求者往往會因為追求本身情感上的滿足,而對被追求者展開一連串跟蹤、監視、寄送簡訊或電子郵件等各種方式騷擾被追求者,使被追求者不堪其擾,進而影響其正常生活作息、學業或工作上的表現,更甚者或有侵害其生命財產安全之虞。然而,目前世界上已有許多國家將纏擾行為視為一種犯罪行為,並以設立專法或增補法條的方式立法規範之,但我國對於纏擾行為之規範尚付之闕如,在缺乏有效且具體的規範下,被害者無其他的方式可限制加害者繼續為纏擾行為,此種情況對纏擾行為之被害者而言,保障確有不足。 以校園中所產生之纏擾行為為例,目前我國仍將校園中之不當追求行為視為性騷擾行為的一種類型,因校園中所涉及成員身分多樣,故涉及之法規更顯繁複。以性別平等教育法有關性騷擾之規定來看,多以消弭性別歧視、促進性別平等為主要目的,依其規定恐無法積極防制纏擾行為。此外,校園中發生纏擾行為事件,學校依性別平等教育法需擔負調查、懲處、輔導等責任,校方能否善盡調查責任、對學生所為之懲處是否能有效遏止纏擾行為,此點仍有待商榷,再加上纏擾行為並非限於校園內發生,學校之影響力如何能及於校外更是一大難題。故本文擬藉由整合法規之方式,降低法規適用上之繁複,並將民事保護令之概念用於防制纏擾行為中,並說明學校及警察機關於防制纏擾行為中應扮演的角色,以提供被害者更完整之保障,期望能藉此達到確實遏止纏擾行為之效果。

並列摘要


Pursuing behavior may be considered to be a romantic performance for People. But recently we have encountered numbers of improper pursuing behavior arising from stalking and violence to fulfill their own emotional desires. This types of behaviors contains stalking, monitoring, SMS or by e-mail and other means of harassment of suitors. Improper pursuing behaviors will affect be suitors academic or work performance in normal life some may infringed their lives and property at risk. However, many countries has pronounced stalking behavior as a crime and established law or additions to law of the way legislative norms of, but for Taiwan, stalking the norms still are neglected, victims has limited law to protect them from the perpetrators continues improper stalking, and due to limited laws we have, this improper behavior would put normal people’s life in danger. Take an example of campus stalking in Taiwan. The government categorized improper behavior on campus as one type of sexual harassment, and due to campus may involve with diverse of members, which involves with complicate laws. Gender Equality Education Act provisions on sexual harassment, the multi to eliminate gender discrimination and promote gender equality as the main purpose. Therefore by this means, it may not be an actively control way to provisions stalking. In addition, stalking incident occurred on campus, school in accordance with the Gender Equity Education Act to be responsible for gender equality investigation and punishment, counseling and other responsibilities, can school fulfill its obligation and be effectively deter stalking, is still debatable. Also, stalking behavior is not limited to the campuses and how schools influence outside of school is a challenge. This thesis intends to integrate regulations by way of reducing the complexity of the regulations and concept of a civil protection order for stalking in control and determine schools, police to enhance the role of “Stalking Prevention” to provide more complete protection of people, in hoping to achieve the effect of actually stop improper stalking behavior. Keyword:Improper pursuit, Stalking, Gender Equity Education Act, Sexual Harassment Prevention Act, Civil protection orders.

參考文獻


高鳳仙,家庭暴力防治法規專論,五南圖書出版,2007年9月2版1刷。
曾瓔瑾、古允文,到底應主觀還是該客觀:從性騷擾防治法的實務執行解讀性騷擾的樣貌,臺灣社會福利學刊第九卷第一期,2010年12月,頁165-212。
蔡宗珍,性騷擾事件之法律適用與救濟途徑之分析─以公務人員間之性騷擾事件為中心,臺北大學法學論叢第77期,2011年3月,頁39-80。
焦興鎧,我國校性騷擾防制機制之建構─性別平等教育法相關條文之剖析,臺北大學法學論叢第62期,2007年6月,頁41-90。
王珮玲,親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因棄之研究:以禁制、遷出及遠離令為例,社會政策與社會工作學刊第14卷第2期,2010年12月,頁1-47。

被引用紀錄


呂雅倫(2016)。論纏擾行為之立法方向-以日本纏擾行為防制法為啟發〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201600550

延伸閱讀