兩岸商務仲裁之研究－投保協議簽署後之發展

The Study of Grand China Commercial Arbitration －Development of the Insured After Signing the Agreement

陳國卿(Kuo-Ching Chen)

指導教授 ： 陳櫻琴

中原大學/商學院/財經法律研究所/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400138

摘要

依「臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例」第74條的規定：「在大陸地區作成之民事確定裁判、民事仲裁判斷，不違背臺灣地區公共秩序或善良風俗者，得聲請法院裁定認可。前項經法院裁定認可之裁判或判斷，以給付為內容者，得為執行名義。基於互惠原則，以在臺灣地區作成之民事確定裁判、民事仲裁判斷，得聲請大陸地區法院裁定認可或為執行名義者，始適用之。同時，中國大陸最高人民法院於亦作出的《最高人民法院關於人民法院認可臺灣地區有關法院民事判決的規定》，也相互認可台灣地區民事判決、仲裁機構裁決的認可效力，從此開始兩岸互相認可的新紀元。我與中國大陸在2012年8月簽署「兩岸投保協議」，將兩岸投資人共同關切的投資自由化及投資人權益，提供明確的規範及保障。未來若能再積極落實兩岸投保協議，不僅能提供台商投資權益制度化的保障，讓台商投資爭議有申訴管道及仲裁機會，健全台商在中國大陸的投資環境，使台商的投資及人身安全獲得更完善的保障。 第一章緒論，探討研究動機、目的、方法以及範圍；第二章主要是探討兩岸經貿投資的糾紛，進而了解經貿仲裁是解決兩岸經貿糾紛的重要途徑，主要是探討以美國雙邊投資協定範本為範例（不含市場開放目的）所簽署兩岸投保協議的主要內容及紛爭解決途徑，第三章主要是探討仲裁判斷作出之後，所產生的確定力和執行力可以作為台商在大陸之權益保護機制；第四章是探討兩岸仲裁制度的比較期不同之處；第五章是研究兩岸經貿糾紛在大陸申請仲裁判斷的案例，所產生的問題及解決的方法；第六章是結論與建議，討論兩岸投保協議簽署之後執行上不足之處，建議作為修法的參考。

關鍵字

仲裁 ； 仲裁判斷 ； 認可 ； 投資保障

並列摘要

By " Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area" in section 74 of the regulations made in Mainland China civil determine the referee , civil arbitration judgment, does not violate Taiwan public order or good morals who may petition a court ruling recognized. Based on the principle of reciprocity , made in Taiwan to determine the civil magistrate , civil arbitration judgment, may apply to the court ruled Mainland China approved or executed in the name of those who , before applicable . Meanwhile, the Chinese mainland on the " Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the recognition of the civil court judgment in Taiwan " Taiwan is also the mutual recognition of civil judgments , arbitration body recognized by the force of , began a new era of cross-strait mutual recognition . I signed with China " Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement " in August 2012 , the equity investment liberalization and investment on both sides of common concern to investors , provide clear norms and protection. If we can actively implement the cross-strait insurance agreement , not only to provide the institutionalized interests of Taiwanese investment protection to Taiwanese investment pipeline grievance and arbitration disputes have the opportunity to improve the investment environment in Taiwan businessmen in mainland China , Taiwan and make investment personal safety to get better protection .
Chapter I INTRODUCTION explore the motivation, purpose, method and scope.The second chapter is to discuss cross-strait trade and investment disputes, and thus is an important way to understand the economic and trade arbitration to resolve cross-strait economic and trade disputes. The third chapter is to discuss the US bilateral investment determine the powers and perform the model agreement as an example (not including open market purposes) strait insurance agreement signed by the main content and ways to resolve disputes, the fourth chapter is to discuss the arbitration judgment after arising capacity as Taiwan in the mainland's rights protection mechanisms.The fifth chapter is to explore the different comparison of the two sides of the arbitration system. Chapter VII is the study of cross-strait economic and trade disputes in arbitration issue mainland judgments application case, and the resulting solution methods. Chapter VII conclusions and recommendations are discussed strait after signing the insurance agreement on the inadequacies of the Operations Department, recommended as a reference for amending the law.

並列關鍵字

Arbitration ； Arbitration judgment ； Recognition ； Investment Protection

參考文獻

李念祖、葉慶元，台商面對兩岸投保協議應有的認識，理律雙月刊，2012年9月出版。

財團法人國家政策研究基金會，投保協議擴大保障範圍的內容，科經（研）101-019號。

陳力，海峽兩岸商事仲裁裁決的相互認可與執行，海峽兩岸經貿仲裁研討會論文集，2011年3月出版。

陳建仁，台灣與中國大陸兩岸仲裁制度之研究，東海大學法律研究所碩士，2001年7月。

朴栽亨，雙邊投資協定徵收條款之研究—以台灣韓國為比較，貿易政策論叢，14期。