住宅室內設計評估指標之建構

Developing Evaluation Indicators for Residential Interior Design

劉懿瑾(Yi-Ching Liu)

指導教授 ： 程萬里 ； 魏主榮

中原大學/設計學院/設計學博士學位學程/博士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201500291

摘要

基於住宅空間對於一個人生活的重要性，探討符合「住宅室內設計」之評估指標，及其在實務觀點上的相關問題，就成為室內設計領域一個重要而有意義的課題。因此，本研究主要的研究目的包括：1. 藉由相關文獻探討，瞭解住宅室內設計評估的相關理論及其內涵；建構住宅室內設計評估指標與評估項目；3. 探討住宅室內設計評估指標與評估項目重要性之評價差異；4. 檢驗不同個人屬性在評估指標與評估項目之差異；並將研究結果，提供給室內設計業者在實務工作上參考依循及一般社會人士做為住宅裝修規劃上之參考。為達成研究目的，本研究共採用了內容分析法、專家會議法、專家問卷調查法、問卷調查等研究方法。在研究流程上，先以國內外住宅室內設計評估相關文獻，進行彙整與分析，經專家初擬住宅室內設計評估概念與題項，再經三次專家會議討論及修改後確立評估概念與題項，再根據前述之研究結果設計成專家問卷；並對54位室內設計產學專家進行專家問卷調查，以模糊德菲法進行專家問卷資料分析，結果篩選出7個住宅室內設計評估概念與64個題項。接著，本研究以這64個題項進行住宅空間使用者問卷調查，抽樣方法為立意取樣；本研究共獲得311份有效問卷。在測量方式與資料分析方法上，本研究採取的是不經「預試」過程，直接進行正式的問卷調查，並以所獲得之資料進行探索性因素分析，在經過二次的刪題與三次因素分析步驟後，建立住宅室內設計評估因素8個與42個題項的研究結果；經專家會議進行因素命名，這8個因素構面分構面別是：「空間美感」、「永續設計」、「安全防災」、「人本設計」、「空間動線」、「智慧住宅」、「家具陳設」、「物理環境」。本研究並進行說明受測樣本的屬性分佈、描述性統計、差異檢定與評估的信度及效度等。最後，本研究依據研究的結果，提出住宅室內設計評估實務上的應用及相關建議。

關鍵字

住宅、室內設計、評估指標、模糊徳菲法

並列摘要

Due to the importance of residential space to one’s life, examining design indicators for residential interior design and issues which maybe encountered in reality has become an essential and significant topic in interior design field. Therefore, the main goals of this study include the following: 1. Define related theories and its context of residential interior design assessment via related literature reviews. 2. Develop evaluation indicators and items for residential interior design. 3. Explore evaluation difference and degree of importance among indicators and items. 4. Examine divergence from different individual attributes to evaluation indicators and items; as well as provide interior design practitioners and the general public with findings and outcomes as references to residential design and modification. Content analysis, expert panels, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and questionnaire are all used in this study to achieve these research goals. As for research process, first, an expert initial residential interior design evaluation indicators and items are generated based on analyses from domestic and international residential interior design evaluation discourse. After discussion and revision from three expert meetings the evaluation concept and items are established. Later, the Expert questionnaire is finalized according to the consensus by 54 selected interior design practitioners and professors. In addition, the study uses Fuzzy Delphi Method to analyze the Expert questionnaire responses and select seven major residential interior design evaluation concepts, including 64 items. With the 64 items, questionnaire to residential space users are conducted later, and 311 valid questionnaires are collected with purposive sampling. Regarding test method and data analysis, no pilot-test is used, the exploratory factor analysis is used on its collected data. Subsequently, two elimination procces and three factor analyses are conducted; as a result, eight residential interior design evaluation indicator factors with 42 items assessment system is established. These eight indicators are “spatial aesthetics,” “sustainable design,” “safeguard prevention,” “human-oriented design,” “spatial flow,” “intelligent housing,” “furniture display,” and “physical environment.” The study also explains attribute distribution of the tested sample, descriptive statistics, and reliability and validity of the difference test and evaluation as well. Finally, suggestions and practical implementations to residential interior design assessment are provided from the research results.

並列關鍵字

Residence ； Interior Design ； Fuzzy Delphi Method ； Evaluation Indicator

參考文獻

賈倍思（1995）。長效住宅-現代建宅新思維。臺北市：地景企業股份有限公司。

游森期、余民寧（2006）。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用，測驗學刊，53（1），128-103。

賴冠宇（2013）。築家自習本:用雙手建構出心之嚮往的美好生活。臺北市：上旗文化事業股份有限公司。

鄧成連（1999）。產品設計評價模式研究-側重不同專業角度之設計評價決策，設計學報，4（2），89-98。

黃琦雯（2008）。民眾的居住環境需求與生活型態關係之研究--以五大都會區為例。國立成功大學建築學系研究所。