研究背景與目的 青少年犯罪議題向來是社會各界所關注的焦點,少年保護事件之執行,可分為訓誡處分、保護管束及感化教育之執行等。本文以誠正中學受感化教育這群犯罪青少年為樣本,從台灣少年感化教育的少年犯的現況出發,瞭解感化教育機構少年犯的處遇內涵與特徵,研究者採用修訂酬賞敏感理論概念,探討探究犯罪青少年在性格、生氣情緒歷程,對違犯行為發生的差異。 研究方法 本研究選擇以受感化教育非行青少年(在校六個月以上)作為研究對象,共有233位,依入校後違規情節、違規次數各區分為三組。研究工具包含基本資料問卷、中文版「Jackson-5 修訂酬賞敏感理論量表」以及狀態特質生氣表達量表、生氣反芻量表,以結構方程模式、差異分析、迴歸進行統計分析。 研究結果 研究結果顯示「中文版Jackson-5修訂酬賞敏感理論量表」具有不錯的信效度。霸凌互毆組和違反團體紀律組及無違犯行為組在Fight、特質生氣及生氣控制有顯著差異,二次以上違規組和無違規組在Fight有顯著差異,在生氣情緒其他變項均未達顯著。 結論 本研究以酬賞敏感性格變項及生氣情緒歷程預測違犯行為的表現水準結果,顯示酬賞敏感性格變項(r-BIS、Fight)對違犯行為最具有預測力。研究證實當個體具備高Fight敏感性時,可能容易產生較多的違犯行為。但r-RST 各系統與生氣情緒交互作用預測違犯行為之關係,仍須進一步研究的驗證。
Background: Juvenile delinquency issues have always been the focus of concern in the community. Youth protection event execution can be divided into reprimand sanction, probation and correctional education execution. In this paper, the researchers choose students taken correctional education in Cheng-Jheng High School as a sample group of juvenile delinquents, in order to study juvenile reformatory education in Taiwan to understand the juvenile probation department in case of educational institutions, content and features. The researchers applied the revised concept of reward-sensitive theories to explore juvenile delinquents in character, angry emotional journey, and differences in occurring violations. Method: In this study, the participants were recruited deliberately from juvenile correction school students (more than six months at the school) in Cheng-Jheng High school, a total of 233, after the circumstances of the violation by entering the school, the district number of violations divided into three groups. Research tools include basic information questionnaire, the Chinese version "Jackson-5 Revision reward sensitivity theory Scale" and the State-Trait Scale express anger, anger rumination scale, structural equation modeling, differential analysis, regression conduct statistical analysis. Results: The results show that "Chinese version of Jackson-5 revised Reinforcement Sensitivity theory Scale" has good reliability and validity. Bullying melee group, the group of discipline violations, and no violation group have significant differences in Fight, trait anger and anger control. Two or more violations groups and no illegal group have significant differences in Fight but in other variables like angry mood were not up significantly. Conclusions: In this study, reward-sensitive personality variables and angry emotional journey violations of standards of performance prediction results show reward-sensitive personality variables (r-BIS, Fight) for violations most predictive power. Study confirmed that when individuals with high Fight sensitivity, it may easily lead to more violations. But r-RST various systems interacting with angry emotions predict violations relationships need further validation studies.