透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.225.255.134
  • 學位論文

兩岸同一企業集團管理型態、工作滿足與組織承諾之比較研究

A Comparative Study Among Managerial Style, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment of the Same Enterprise in Taiwan and Mainland China

指導教授 : 林久翔
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


台灣企業集團前往大陸地區投資設廠的比例逐年攀升,但卻鮮少有關於比較兩岸同一企業集團之管理型態、工作滿足與組織承諾的學術研究。本研究利用李克特所提出之四種管理系統對主管領導行為做分類,愈傾向系統一者為獨裁之管理方式,而愈傾向系統四者為民主之管理方式。 本研究係以國內某上市集團兩岸之員工為研究母體,探討其台灣與大陸員工之管理型態、工作滿足與組織承諾間的關係。共發放500份問卷,回收350份,回收率70%,剔除無效問卷54份後,實際有效問卷共296份。資料分析所使用的方法依序為:敘述性統計分析、因素分析、信效度檢定、單因子變異數分析、相關分析及迴歸分析。經由SPSS統計軟體分析資料後,結果如下: 一、管理型態與工作滿足在兩岸均具有顯著的相關性,而系統三的管理型態在工作滿足及其構面上較系統二明顯相關。經由迴歸分析後得知,管理型態正向影響工作滿足,表示組織愈趨向系統四之管理型態,則兩岸員工的工作滿足感就愈佳。 二、管理型態與組織承諾在兩岸均具有顯著的相關性,而系統三的管理型態在組織承諾及其構面上較系統二明顯相關。經由迴歸分析後得知,管理型態正向影響組織承諾,表示組織愈趨向系統四的管理型態,則兩岸員工的組織承諾感就愈佳。 三、工作滿足正向影響組織承諾,在兩岸均獲得驗證。而工作滿足之構面,影響組織承諾在兩岸則有所差異。台灣員工部份,工作本身、直屬上司、薪資及升遷與工作夥伴,皆正向影響組織承諾感之高低。而在大陸員工部份,僅有工作本身正向造成高組織承諾感。

並列摘要


Taiwan’s enterprise groups invest in mainland China increasing year by year, but fewer researches compare about managerial style, job satisfaction and organizational commitment cross-straight of the same enterprise. The author distributed 500 questionnaires to a listed company in Taiwan and another factory in mainland China. The response rate was 70 percent (350 questionnaires). This study represents a detailed analysis of 296 qualified responses. The results are summarized below: 1. The relationship between managerial style and job satisfaction is positive in both sides. System 3 of the managerial style is obviously relative than system 2 in job satisfaction and its factors. After regression analysis, the relationship between managerial style and job satisfaction is positive. It means that when organizations close to system 4, then the employees’ satisfaction is better. 2. The relationship between managerial style and organization commitment is positive in both sides. System 3 of the managerial style is obviously relative than system 2 in organization commitment. The relationship between managerial style and organization commitment is positive. It means theat when organizations close to system 4, then the employees’ satisfaction is better. 3. The relationship between job satisfaction and organization commitment is positive in both sides. But differentiate in its factors. Employees in Taiwan, job itself, superiors, salary and promotion, work parners, are positive effect the degree of organization commitment. Employees in China, only job itself causes high organization commitment.

參考文獻


6.陳吳政,2002,組織文化、領導行為、工作滿足與組織承諾之關係研究-以嘉南地區銀行為例,國立成功大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文。
9.莊博貴,2003,兩岸員工工作價值、工作投入、工作滿足與組織承諾之研究-以某電纜公司為例,國立成功大學管理學院EMBA未出版碩士論文。
1.Abdulrahman, A.J., & Hollingsworth, A.T. (1983). An exploratory study of managerial practices in the Arabian gulf region. Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 143-152.
2.Abraham, R. (2000). The role of job control as a moderator of emotional dissonance and emotional intelligence-outcome relationships. The Journal of Psychology, Vol.134, No.2, 169-184.
3.Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.

延伸閱讀