透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.81.94
  • 學位論文

創新、資本結構、和債券市場之實證研究

An Empirical Study of Innovation, Capital Structure, and Bond Market

指導教授 : 陳玉麟
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


債券市場為近年來國內企業重要的外部融資管道之一,而無形資產在知識經濟下更顯重要。國內研究卻鮮少有人由債權人的觀點來檢視研發支出,因此,本研究探討研發密集度、資本結構與債券風險溢酬之間的關係。 具體而言,本研究透過敘述性統計、相關係數分析、複迴歸分析,來檢視研發密集度與資本結構的關聯性、研發密集度與債券風險溢酬的關聯性、以及研發密集度與資本結構的交互作用與風險溢酬的關聯性,以及管理型態對上述關係的影響。 本研究發現高研發密集度的公司,會有較低的財務槓桿。當期研發支出與風險溢酬間呈現正向顯著,顯示債權人會把當期研發支出視為負債性質支出。低負債搭配高研發或是高負債搭配低研發能降低債券風險溢酬。上述的現象在家族管理企業更為明顯。

並列摘要


Recently, the bond market is one of the primary external financing channels for the company in Taiwan, while the intangible assets become more important in the knowledge-based economy. In Taiwan, there are limited studies to examine the research and development (R&D) from the bondholders’ view of point. Therefore, this study examines the relationship among R&D intensity, capital structure, and bond risk premium. More specifically, this study investigates the association between R&D intensity and capital structure, the association between R&D intensity and bond risk premium, as well as the performance implications of interactions between R&D intensity and capital structure. Furthermore, this study explores the impacts of business type on the aforementioned relationships. The empirical analyses are conducted by the descriptive statistics analysis, correlative coefficient analysis, and regression analysis. The study finds that there is a negative association between R&D intensity and financial leverage. From the perspective of bondholders, a negative correlation between risk premium and R&D intensity. The lower bond risk premium results from R&D investment only to the extent that there is fit between the R&D and capital structure. The aforementioned relationships are more obvious in the family business than non-family business.

參考文獻


財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會,(2006) 財務會計準則公報第三十七號:無形資產之會計處理。
范宏書、林彥廷 (2009),「研發密集公司勝於報酬產生原因:風險溢酬或錯誤定價?」,證券市場發展季刊(即將刋登) 。
王元章、辜儀芳 (2003),「資本結構的選擇、融資與負債規模的清償」,財務金融學刊,第11卷第3期,35-87。
李永全、馬黛 (2006),「台灣家族企業負債融資成本之研究」,管理評論,第25卷第3期,69-91。
葉銀華 (1998),「家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究—台灣與香港證券市場之比較」,中山管理評論,18卷第2期,59-86。

延伸閱讀