摘要 本研究係針對目前桃園縣地方教育視導人員之工作績效進行研究與評估,透過文獻分析與我國地方視導之工作要點,探討地方視導人員所具備之專業能力,並建立其工作績效自我評估量表。 根據自編之「地方視導人員工作績效之自我評估量表」針對桃園縣教育處正式督學與聘任督學共32位進行工作績效之自我評估。以了解目前桃園縣督學之工作績效現況,並探討不同背景變項督學對於自我工作績效評估之差異情形。 其研究結果如下: 一、現行地方視導人員已由過去的威權轉為協助的角色。 二、在聘任督學制度之實施上,職權劃分不清。 三、桃園縣督學之目前工作績效在「整體評估」表現上,桃園縣督學評估其自我之工作績效為「中上」程度。 四、在「視導專業知能」、「視導工作任務達成」、「個人工作行為」三層面中,桃園縣督學評估自我工作績效之表現情形皆為「中上」程度。 五、視導工作績效之評估易因外在因素影響而造成結果不客觀。 六、在「性別」、「最高學歷」、「擔任職務」、「擔任督學年資」等變項中,督學之自我績效評估均無顯著差異。 七、桃園縣督學在「師資培育背景」變項中,僅於「視導專業知能」層面有顯著之差異。 根據上述所得之研究結果,本研究針對教育主管機關、地方視導人員,及未來研究提出建議,以作為改進之用。
Abstract The purpose of the research is to investigate and evaluation the local supervisor’s accountability in Taoyuan. Through analysis of the literature explore local supervisor’s professional capacity. And construct the accountability self-evaluation scale. According to the “local supervisor’s accountability self-evaluation scale” survey thirty-two supervisors is in Taoyuan. To understand the current situation of supervisor’s accountability is in Taoyuan, and to explore different background variables supervisor for self-evaluation of the accountability differences. Study findings are described as follows: 1. Currently, Local Supervisor’s roles have from the past authoritarian role to cooperator. 2. The appointed supervisor’s authority is indefinite. 3. In “overall evaluation”, the supervisor’s accountability in Taoyuan is “above middle” level. 4. From the three levels, “the professional capacity of supervision”, “the task attaining of supervision”, and “the behavior of work”, the supervisor’s accountability in Taoyuan County are all “above middle” level. 5. The evaluating accountability of supervision is affected easily by external factors caused the results not objective. 6. There were no significant differences in supervisors' self-evaluation in relation to different gender, academic qualification, position, and years of service. 7. The only “teacher training backgrounds” variable is that showed significant difference in “the professional capacity of supervision”. According to the results of the research, there are suggestions in educational administrations and supervisors, and the direction of future study.