智慧財產法院之運作問題與判決分析

Operation questions and Decision analysis of the Intellectual Property Court

王靜怡(Ching-Yi Wang)

指導教授 ： 陳櫻琴

中原大學/商學院/財經法律研究所/碩士(2010年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201000813

摘要

研究目的
因應智慧財產權對於目前的社會發展日益重要，因此，相關的智慧財產案件亦每日遽增，過去智慧財產案件的處理都是由普通法院來審理，以設立「專庭」的方式來進行判斷。然，參考國內外的審理模式，係由智慧財產權專業的法院來加以審理。故而，我國於2008年於板橋設立專業的智慧財產法院，專門於處理智慧財產之案件，本文即探討目前設立後智慧財產法院運行後有無問題發生，以及對於設立法院後針對案件的審理有無改善之處。
文獻
本文參考文獻係以實務研討會、法院之司法周刊、學者期刊論文內容為基礎，輔以司法院所提供的法學資料各級法院和智慧財產法院所撰寫完成的判決為參考依據。
研究方法
先以研析方式提出智慧財產法院運作上的問題，加上法院判決和研討會予以比較分析，主要方法為「比較分析法」、「判決之研究」、「比較研究法」。
研究內容
本文先討論智慧財產法院的設立經過及處理案件之流程。之後提出五個運作上的問題，分別為「管轄」、「行政訴訟的新證據」、「權利有效性」、「技術審查官制度」、「秘密保持命令制度」，就案件程序上及實體上加以討論。輔以相關的研討會意見、實務上判決、學界上看法，綜合說明之。
研究結果
本文發現於運作中的智慧財產法院改善公、私法訴訟二元分立制度之缺失，將智慧財產民、刑事及行政訴訟集中由智慧財產法院之專業法官審理，且就民、刑事訴訟中關於智慧財產權有效性之主張與抗辯，民、刑事法院應自為判斷，減少訴訟延滯之可能性；增設技術審查官，藉由技術專家之參與訴訟，協助法官對技術問題之深入瞭解及正確判斷；引進秘密保持命令制度，兼顧訴訟權益及營業祕密之保護；容許於智慧財產行政訴訟中，針對同一應撤銷之理由，提出新證據等特別規定，期符合立法目標。

關鍵字

判決分析 ； 智慧財產法院

並列摘要

Research goal
Is day by day important in accordance to the wisdom property rights regarding the present social development, therefore, the related intellectual property case also every day surges, in the past intellectual property case's processing was tries by the Common court, set up “the special courtyard” the way carried on the judgment. However, refers to the domestic and foreign trying pattern, is comes by the wisdom property rights specialized court to try. Therefore, our country sets up the specialized intellectual property court in 2008 in the plank bridge, case in the processing intellectual property, after this article is the discussion present sets up, the intellectual property court movement, specially whether there is the question occurrence, as well as after setting up the court in view of the case's place of trying whether there is improvement.
Literature
This article reference is take the practice seminar, judicature of weekly, the scholar periodical paper content the court as a foundation, the decision which take the judicial yuan auxiliary provides legal science material all levels of courts which and the intellectual property court composes completes as the reference.
Research technique
Analyzes the way to propose that first in the intellectual property court operation's question, in addition the court decision and the seminar give the comparative analysis, the main method is “the comparison analytic method”, “research of the decision”, “the comparison methodology”.
Research content
This article discusses the intellectual property court to set up first passes through and flow of the processing case. Afterward proposed five operate the question, respectively is “the jurisdiction”, “the administrative proceedings fresh evidence”, “the right validity”, “the technical referendary system”, “the secret maintains the order system”, performs on the case procedure in and the entity to discuss. Auxiliary by in the related seminar opinion, the practice decides, in the educational world the view, general account it.
Findings
This article discovers in the operation the intellectual property court improves male, flaw of the civil law lawsuit dual separation system, the intellectual property people, criminal and the administrative proceedings centralism professional judge tries by the intellectual property court, and on the people, in the criminal prosecution with contradicts position of about the wisdom property rights validity, the people, the Criminal court should from be the judgments, reduces possibility of the lawsuit lagging; The addition technology referendary, participation of lawsuit because of the technical expert, assists judge to the technical question the inquire deeply and the correct judgment; The introduction secret maintains the order system, protection of the proper attention to both lawsuit rights and interests and the trade secret; Allowed that in the intellectual property administrative proceedings, reason in view of identical should the cancellation, proposed that the fresh evidence and so on special regulation, the time conforms to the legislative goal.

並列關鍵字

Decision analysis ； Intellectual Property Court

參考文獻

司法院編製，智慧財產案件審理法-新制問答彙編，2008年6月。

王孟如，智慧財產訴訟新紀元─智慧財產案件審理法評析，2009年7月。

司法院編印，智慧財產組織法、智慧財產案件審理法之立法理由，2007年2月。

黃麟倫，『智慧財產案件審理法』，經濟部智慧財產局，2009年6月。

張靜，營業秘密法及相關智權問題，經濟部智慧財產局，2007年8月。