大學生自我效能、壓力因應與生命凝聚感的關係

The relationship among self-efficacy, coping of stress, and sense of coherence of college students

梁家綺(Chia-chi Liang)

指導教授 ： 譚偉象

中原大學/理學院/心理學研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2013.00342

摘要

中文摘要
研究背景與目的　本研究欲以健康的大學生探討有關生命凝聚感的議題，從自我效能為基礎，探討大學生自我效能、壓力因應和生命凝聚感的關係。本研究認為個體對壓力因應的方式在其間扮演了一個部份中介的角色，對自我效能不僅會影響對於生命凝聚感的高低，同時也會影響個體對於壓力因應的方式，而此壓力因應的方式會直接影響個體對於生命凝聚感的高低。本研究欲探討的焦點問題如下：自我效能的高低，是否會透過個體對於壓力因應的中介作用，影響個體對生命凝聚感的適應能力。
研究方法　本研究對象為正在就讀四技或大學的學生，根據方便取樣方式決定參與之受試者，共計690名參與者。研究變項為性別、年齡、年級、學習成就、社會支持、憂鬱傾向、自我效能、問題解決導向的壓力因應方式、情緒導向的壓力因應方式以及生命凝聚感等變項，研究工具為自陳式問卷的形式，共包含六個部份，分別為：基本資料表、一般自我效能量表、壓力因應量表、生命凝聚感量表、社會支持量表及憂鬱傾向量表。
研究結果　本研究主要發現自我效能對生命凝聚感有預測力，個體對於生命凝聚感的高低，主要是仰賴個體如何看待自我效能而定；自我效能者和問題解決導向的壓力因應方式有正相關；自我效能和情緒導向的壓力因應方式有負相關；問題解決導向的壓力因應方式和生命凝聚感有正相關。在自我效能、壓力因應方式與生命凝聚感三個概念中，問題解決導向的壓力因應方式是自我效能與生命凝聚感的部分中介變項，但情緒導向的壓力因應方式不是自我效能與生命凝聚感的部份中介變項。

關鍵字

自我效能 ； 生命凝聚感 ； 壓力因應方式

並列摘要

Abstract
Research background & aims: This study intends to discuss the issues of healthy college students exploring sense of coherence and to investigate the relationship among self-efficacy, coping of stress, and sense of coherence. This study thinks that individual’s coping of stress act partially as a role of mediation. Self-efficacy not only influences the sense of coherence but also influence the way of coping of stress; therefore, coping of stress would influence the sense of coherence directly. In this study, we aim to find that whether coping of stress might mediate the relationship between the self-efficacy and the sense of coherence.
Methods: 690 college students participated in the research, and subjects decided to participate in the accidental sampling. The major variables in this study are gender, age, grade, academic achievement, social support, depressive tendencies, self-efficacy, problem-solving orientation of the coping of stress, emotional orientation of the coping of stress, and sense of coherence. The research used the survey method and the questionnaire consisted of the self-efficacy scale, the coping of stress scale, the sense of coherence scale (SOC-13), the multidimensional scale of support scale (MSPSS), and the CES-D scale.
Results: This study found that self-efficacy can predict sense of coherence and sense of coherence depend mainly on how individual deal with his self-efficacy; self-efficacy has positive correlation with problem-solving orientation of the coping of stress, self-efficacy has negative correlation with emotional orientation of the coping of stress, and sense of coherence has positive correlation with problem-solving orientation of the coping of stress. In the relationship among self-efficacy, coping of stress, and sense of coherence of college students, problem-solving orientation of the coping of stress is the partial mediation of self-efficacy and sense of coherence, and emotional orientation of the coping of stress is not the partial mediation of self-efficacy and sense of coherence.

並列關鍵字

self-efficacy ； coping of stress ； sense of coherence

參考文獻

葉馨琇(2007)。精神病患的生命凝聚感與活動參與。國立台灣大學職能治療所碩士論文，台北市。

Bao, L-P., & Liu, J-S. (2005). The reliability and validity of Chinese Version of SOC-13. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13, 399-401.

康淑美(1990)。以肌電圖生理迴饋儀作為研究工具之方法與考慮。職能治療學會雜誌，8， 71 -76。

吳政航(2007)。大學生家庭功能與壓力因應型態對憂鬱症狀之影響。國立成功大學行為醫學所碩士論文，台南市。

張宇岱(2003)。焦慮合併酒癮與焦慮患者在酒精效果預期、拒酒自我效能及壓力因應方式上的差異。國立成功大學行為醫學所碩士論文，台南市。